Literature DB >> 19459065

Variability of carotid artery measurements on 3-Tesla MRI and its impact on sample size calculation for clinical research.

Mushabbar A Syed1, John N Oshinski, Charles Kitchen, Arshad Ali, Richard J Charnigo, Arshed A Quyyumi.   

Abstract

Carotid MRI measurements are increasingly being employed in research studies for atherosclerosis imaging. The majority of carotid imaging studies use 1.5 T MRI. Our objective was to investigate intra-observer and inter-observer variability in carotid measurements using high resolution 3 T MRI. We performed 3 T carotid MRI on 10 patients (age 56 +/- 8 years, 7 male) with atherosclerosis risk factors and ultrasound intima-media thickness > or =0.6 mm. A total of 20 transverse images of both right and left carotid arteries were acquired using T2 weighted black-blood sequence. The lumen and outer wall of the common carotid and internal carotid arteries were manually traced; vessel wall area, vessel wall volume, and average wall thickness measurements were then assessed for intra-observer and inter-observer variability. Pearson and intraclass correlations were used in these assessments, along with Bland-Altman plots. For inter-observer variability, Pearson correlations ranged from 0.936 to 0.996 and intraclass correlations from 0.927 to 0.991. For intra-observer variability, Pearson correlations ranged from 0.934 to 0.954 and intraclass correlations from 0.831 to 0.948. Calculations showed that inter-observer variability and other sources of error would inflate sample size requirements for a clinical trial by no more than 7.9%, indicating that 3 T MRI is nearly optimal in this respect. In patients with subclinical atherosclerosis, 3 T carotid MRI measurements are highly reproducible and have important implications for clinical trial design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19459065     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-009-9468-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  23 in total

1.  Carotid plaque area: a tool for targeting and evaluating vascular preventive therapy.

Authors:  J David Spence; Michael Eliasziw; Maria DiCicco; Daniel G Hackam; Ramzy Galil; Tara Lohmann
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaque using multicontrast MRI acquired under simulated in vivo conditions.

Authors:  Binjian Sun; Don P Giddens; Robert Long; W Robert Taylor; Diana Weiss; Giji Joseph; David Vega; John N Oshinski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Multicontrast black-blood MRI of carotid arteries: comparison between 1.5 and 3 tesla magnetic field strengths.

Authors:  Vasily L Yarnykh; Masahiro Terashima; Cecil E Hayes; Ann Shimakawa; Norihide Takaya; Patricia K Nguyen; Jean H Brittain; Michael V McConnell; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Multislice dark-blood carotid artery wall imaging: a 1.5 T and 3.0 T comparison.

Authors:  Ioannis Koktzoglou; Yiu-Cho Chung; Venkatesh Mani; Timothy J Carroll; Mark D Morasch; Gabor Mizsei; Orlando P Simonetti; Zahi A Fayad; Debiao Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group.

Authors:  D H O'Leary; J F Polak; R A Kronmal; T A Manolio; G L Burke; S K Wolfson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-01-07       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Reproducibility of carotid atherosclerotic lesion type characterization using high resolution multicontrast weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Baocheng Chu; Binh An P Phan; Niranjan Balu; Chun Yuan; B Greg Brown; Xue-Qiao Zhao
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  P Pignoli; E Tremoli; A Poli; P Oreste; R Paoletti
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Characterisation of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and histology.

Authors:  G Puppini; F Furlan; N Cirota; G Veraldi; Q Piubello; S Montemezzi; G Gortenuti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Psychological stress and the progression of carotid artery disease.

Authors:  P A Barnett; J D Spence; S B Manuck; J R Jennings
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.844

10.  Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid plaque features with in vivo MR imaging.

Authors:  Tobias Saam; Jianming Cai; Lin Ma; You-Quan Cai; Marina S Ferguson; Nayak L Polissar; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Carotid plaque imaging and the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Guangming Zhu; Jason Hom; Ying Li; Bin Jiang; Fatima Rodriguez; Dominik Fleischmann; David Saloner; Michele Porcu; Yanrong Zhang; Luca Saba; Max Wintermark
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-08

2.  Increasing spatial resolution of 3T MRI scanning improves reproducibility of carotid arterial wall dimension measurements.

Authors:  Diederik F van Wijk; Aart C Strang; Raphael Duivenvoorden; Dirk-Jan F Enklaar; Rob J van der Geest; John J P Kastelein; Eric de Groot; Erik S G Stroes; Aart J Nederveen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Effect of Angiotensin II Type I Receptor Blockade with Valsartan on Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis: A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Valsartan and Placebo (EFFERVESCENT).

Authors:  Ronnie Ramadan; Saurabh S Dhawan; José Nilo G Binongo; Ayman Alkhoder; Dean P Jones; John N Oshinski; Arshed A Quyyumi
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Carotid magnetic resonance imaging for monitoring atherosclerotic plaque progression: a multicenter reproducibility study.

Authors:  Jie Sun; Xue-Qiao Zhao; Niranjan Balu; Daniel S Hippe; Thomas S Hatsukami; Daniel A Isquith; Kiyofumi Yamada; Moni B Neradilek; Gádor Cantón; Yunjing Xue; Jerome L Fleg; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; Michael T Klimas; Robert J Padley; Maria T Vassileva; Bradley T Wyman; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3.0 T: current state of the art.

Authors:  John N Oshinski; Jana G Delfino; Puneet Sharma; Ahmed M Gharib; Roderic I Pettigrew
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Carotid artery disease and stroke: assessing risk with vessel wall MRI.

Authors:  William S Kerwin
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-14

7.  Comparison of Gated and Ungated Black-Blood Fast Spin-echo MRI of Carotid Vessel Wall at 3T.

Authors:  Chengcheng Zhu; Martin J Graves; Umar Sadat; Victoria E Young; Jonathan H Gillard; Andrew J Patterson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.471

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.