Literature DB >> 16554956

Use of in vitro critical inhibitory concentration, a novel approach to predict in vivo synergistic bactericidal effect of combined amikacin and piperacillin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a systemic rat infection model.

Eli Chan1, Shufeng Zhou, Sahasranaman Srikumar, Wei Duan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to explore the use of in vitro critical inhibitory concentration (CIC) as a surrogate marker relating the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters to in vivo bactericidal synergistic effect [pharmacodynamic (PD)] of amikacin + piperacillin combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a systemic rat infection model.
METHODS: The in vitro antibacterial activities of amikacin and piperacillin, alone and in combinations at various ratios of the concentrations, were tested against a standard [5 x 10(5) colony-forming units (CFU)/ml] and a large (1.5 x 10(8) CFU/ml) inoculum of P. aeruginosa ATCC 9027 using a modified survival-time method. The CIC of each individual antibiotic for the different combinations was determined using a cup-plate method. In vivo studies were performed on Sprague-Dawley rats using a systemic model of infection with P. aeruginosa ATCC 9027. PK profiles and in vivo killing effects of the combination at different dosing ratios were studied.
RESULTS: An inoculum effect was observed with the antibiotics studied. Synergy was seen against both the inocula at the following concentration ratios: 70% C(ami) + 30% C(pip) and 75% C(ami) + 25% C(pip), where C(ami) and C(pip) are the concentrations of amikacin and piperacillin to produce a 1000-fold decrease in bacterial population over 5 h, respectively. The CIC values determined corroborated with the order of in vitro bacterial killing observed for the antibiotic combinations. The dosing ratio of 12.6 mg/kg amikacin + 36 mg/kg piperacillin (a 70:30 ratio of the individual doses) exhibited the greatest killing in vivo when compared to the other ratios. The PK-PD relationships were described by simple, linear regression equations using the area under the in vivo killing curve as a PD marker and the AUCIC(ami)/CIC(ami) + AUCIC(pip)/CIC(pip), AUC(ami)/CIC(ami) + AUC(pip)/CIC(pip), C(max,ami)/CIC(ami) + C(max,pip)/CIC(pip), and AUCIC(ami)/MIC(ami) + AUCIC(pip)/MIC(pip) as PK markers for the amikacin + piperacillin combination.
CONCLUSION: The combination of amikacin and piperacillin exhibited synergistic killing effect on P. aeruginosa that could be modeled using CIC as a surrogate marker relating the PK parameters to in vivo bactericidal effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16554956     DOI: 10.1007/s11095-006-9783-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  31 in total

1.  Combined effects of vancomycin and imipenem against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  K Totsuka; M Shiseki; K Kikuchi; Y Matsui
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  Inoculum effect.

Authors:  I Brook
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1989 May-Jun

3.  Effects of amoxicillin subinhibitory concentrations on the cross-protection developed by pneumococcal antibodies in mouse sepsis caused by an amoxicillin-resistant serotype 6B Streptococcus pneumoniae strain.

Authors:  D Tarragó; L Aguilar; M J Giménez; A Fenoll; J Casal
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Nosocomial infections due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: epidemiology and treatment options.

Authors:  Marilee D Obritsch; Douglas N Fish; Robert MacLaren; Rose Jung
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 5.  Antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients: a review of pathophysiological conditions responsible for altered disposition and pharmacokinetic variability.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Pharmacodynamics of the new fluoroquinolone gatifloxacin in murine thigh and lung infection models.

Authors:  D Andes; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  How can we predict bacterial eradication?

Authors:  Michael R Jacobs
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Effect of inoculum size on the in-vitro susceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics of Moraxella catarrhalis isolates of different beta-lactamase types.

Authors:  S F Yeo; D M Livermore
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Determination of piperacillin and mezlocillin in human serum and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography after derivatisation with 1,2,4-triazole.

Authors:  J C García-Gonzalez; R Méndez; J Martín-Villacorta
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  1998-07-03       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 10.  The importance of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate markers to outcome. Focus on antibacterial agents.

Authors:  J M Hyatt; P S McKinnon; G S Zimmer; J J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.447

View more
  2 in total

1.  Inoculum effect of β-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  Justin R Lenhard; Zackery P Bulman
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Microscopic Analysis of Bacterial Inoculum Effect Using Micropatterned Biochip.

Authors:  Jung Ho Hwang; Sang Young Lee; Jungil Choi
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.