Literature DB >> 33805824

Microscopic Analysis of Bacterial Inoculum Effect Using Micropatterned Biochip.

Jung Ho Hwang1, Sang Young Lee2, Jungil Choi3.   

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance has become a major problem in public health and clinical environments. Against this background, antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) has become necessary to cure diseases in an appropriate and timely manner as it indicates the necessary concentration of antibiotics. Recently, microfluidic based rapid AST methods using microscopic analysis have been shown to reduce the time needed for the determination of the proper antibiotics. However, owing to the inoculum effect, the accurate measurement of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) is difficult. We tested four standard bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Enterococcus faecalis, against five different antibiotics: piperacillin, cefotaxime, amikacin, levofloxacin, and ampicillin. The results showed that overall, the microfluidic system has a similar inoculum effect compared to the conventional AST method. However, due to the different testing conditions and determination protocols of the growth of the microfluidic based rapid AST, a few results are not identical to the conventional methods using optical density. This result suggests that microfluidic based rapid AST methods require further research on the inoculum effect for practical use in hospitals and can then be used for effective antibiotic prescriptions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibiotic susceptibility testing; image-based AST; inoculum effect; minimal inhibitory concentration

Year:  2021        PMID: 33805824      PMCID: PMC7998646          DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10030300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)        ISSN: 2079-6382


  42 in total

1.  In vitro activities of ceftobiprole combined with amikacin or levofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: evidence of a synergistic effect using time-kill methodology.

Authors:  Michael Kresken; Barbara Körber-Irrgang; Jörg Läuffer; Sabine Decker-Burgard; Todd Davies
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 2.  Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Jessica M A Blair; Mark A Webber; Alison J Baylay; David O Ogbolu; Laura J V Piddock
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Comparison of agar dilution, microtitre broth dilution and tube macrodilution susceptibility testing of ciprofloxacin against several pathogens at two different inocula.

Authors:  M E Gombert; T M Aulicino
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  A rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test based on single-cell morphological analysis.

Authors:  Jungil Choi; Jungheon Yoo; Mincheol Lee; Eun-Geun Kim; Ji Soo Lee; Seungok Lee; Seik Joo; Sang Hoon Song; Eui-Chong Kim; Jung Chan Lee; Hee Chan Kim; Yong-Gyun Jung; Sunghoon Kwon
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and the inoculum effect in tests with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  K S Thomson; E S Moland
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Inoculum effect of new beta-lactam antibiotics on Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  R H Eng; S M Smith; C Cherubin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Influence of inoculum size on activity of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, moxalactam, piperacillin, and N-formimidoyl thienamycin (MK0787) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  M L Corrado; S H Landesman; C E Cherubin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Bactericidal killing activities of cefepime, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone against Staphylococcus aureus and beta-lactamase-producing strains of Enterobacter aerogenes and Klebsiella pneumoniae in an in vitro infection model.

Authors:  S M Palmer; S L Kang; D M Cappelletty; M J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review.

Authors:  Mounyr Balouiri; Moulay Sadiki; Saad Koraichi Ibnsouda
Journal:  J Pharm Anal       Date:  2015-12-02

10.  Comparison of the inoculum size effects of antibiotics on IMP-6 β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae co-harboring plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Ogawa; Ryuichi Nakano; Kei Kasahara; Tomoki Mizuno; Nobuyasu Hirai; Akiyo Nakano; Yuki Suzuki; Naoki Kakuta; Takashi Masui; Hisakazu Yano; Keiichi Mikasa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.