Literature DB >> 17573035

Changes in growth and morphology of the condyle following mandibular distraction in minipigs: overloading or underloading?

Katherine L Rafferty1, Zongyang Sun, Mark Egbert, Daniel W Bakko, Susan W Herring.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Loading of temporomandibular tissues during mandibular distraction may cause changes in condylar growth and cartilage thickness. This study examines the effects of distraction on the condyle in a large animal model by explicitly measuring growth and in vivo loading.
DESIGN: Unilateral mandibular distraction was carried out on 20 growing minipigs divided into three groups. One group underwent distraction but not consolidation, whereas the other two groups were allowed a period of consolidation of either 1 or 2 weeks. Animals received fluorochrome and 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) labelling and masticatory strain was measured from the condylar neck. Condylar strain was also recorded in an age-matched sample of eight animals that received no distraction surgery. Immunohistochemical procedures were used to identify dividing prechondroblasts and histological analysis was used to measure mineral apposition rate, count dividing cells, and measure the thickness of condylar cartilage.
RESULTS: Strain magnitude, particularly compressive strain, was much larger on the non-distraction side compared to the distraction side condyle. Compared to normal loading levels, the distraction side condyle was underloaded whereas the condyle on the intact side was overloaded. Mineral apposition and cartilage thickness were greater on the distraction side condyle compared to the opposite side. Differences between the sides were most pronounced in the group with no consolidation and became progressively reduced with consolidation time.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased mineralisation and cartilage thickness on the distraction side condyle are associated with reduced, not increased loading, perhaps because of disruption of the distraction side masseter muscle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17573035      PMCID: PMC4274955          DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Oral Biol        ISSN: 0003-9969            Impact factor:   2.633


  21 in total

1.  Condylar mineralization following mandibular distraction in rats.

Authors:  Z J Liu; G J King; S W Herring
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the glenoid fossa and mandibular condyle bone after bilateral vertical ramus mandibular distraction in a canine model.

Authors:  Eduardo Franzotti Sant'Anna; David F Gomez; Dale R Sumner; James M Williams; Alvaro A Figueroa; Srdjan A Ostric; Spero Theodoru; John W Polley
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Histological evaluation of the temporomandibular joint after bilateral vertical ramus mandibular distraction in a canine model.

Authors:  Eduardo F Sant'Anna; David F Gomez; John W Polley; Rick D Sumner; James M Williams; Alvaro A Figueroa; Ana Maria Bolognese
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Mandibular mechanics following osteotomy and appliance placement II: Bone strain on the body and condylar neck.

Authors:  Katherine L Rafferty; Zongyang Sun; Mark A Egbert; Emily E Baird; Susan W Herring
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Microscopic changes in the condyle and disc in response to distraction osteogenesis of the minipig mandible.

Authors:  Petra Thurmüller; Maria J Troulis; Andrew Rosenberg; Sung-Kiang Chuang; Leonard B Kaban
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Influence of distraction rates on the temporomandibular joint position and cartilage morphology in a rabbit model of mandibular lengthening.

Authors:  B Kruse-Lösler; U Meyer; C Flören; U Joos
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Effect of mandibular distraction on the temporomandibular joint: Part 1, Canine study.

Authors:  S U McCormick; J G McCarthy; B H Grayson; D Staffenberg; S A McCormick
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Forward mandibular positioning enhances condylar adaptation in adult rats.

Authors:  A B M Rabie; H Xiong; U Hägg
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Alterations of morphology and microdensity in the condyle after mandibular osteodistraction in the rat.

Authors:  Zi Jun Liu; Gregory J King; Susan W Herring
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Three-dimensional loading and growth of the zygomatic arch.

Authors:  K L Rafferty; S W Herring; F Artese
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  4 in total

1.  Differential response of pig masseter to botulinum neurotoxin serotypes a and b.

Authors:  Zi-Jun Liu; Katherine L Rafferty; Wenmin Ye; Susan W Herring
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Murine TMJ loading causes increased proliferation and chondrocyte maturation.

Authors:  T Sobue; W-C Yeh; A Chhibber; A Utreja; V Diaz-Doran; D Adams; Z Kalajzic; J Chen; S Wadhwa
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  A distal 594 bp ECR specifies Hmx1 expression in pinna and lateral facial morphogenesis and is regulated by the Hox-Pbx-Meis complex.

Authors:  Jessica M Rosin; Wenjie Li; Liza L Cox; Sara M Rolfe; Victor Latorre; Jennifer A Akiyama; Axel Visel; Takashi Kuramoto; Nicoletta Bobola; Eric E Turner; Timothy C Cox
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 4.  Effect of mechanical loading on the metabolic activity of cells in the temporomandibular joint: a systematic review.

Authors:  Beatriz F Betti; Vincent Everts; Johannes C F Ket; Hessam Tabeian; Astrid D Bakker; Geerling E Langenbach; Frank Lobbezoo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.573

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.