Literature DB >> 11809476

Blur detection thresholds in childhood myopia: single and dual target presentation.

Katrina L Schmid1, D Robert Iskander, Roger W H Li, Marion H Edwards, John K F Lew.   

Abstract

There is some suggestion that the ability to detect blur may be altered in adults with myopia. Here, we address the question of whether children with myopia have worse blur detection than other children, and whether blur detection in myopic children is related to the rate of myopia progression. We recruited 20 myopes and 20 non-myopes aged between 8 and 12 years. Refractive errors, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity were measured and the change in refractive error over the past year calculated from clinic records. Blur detection thresholds for two different types of black and white targets (text and scenes), two illumination conditions and two testing protocols were determined using a computer-based forced-choice testing procedure. The two testing protocols used were: (i) dual image presentation where subjects were asked to choose the clearer of the two images, one image always having zero blur, and (ii) single image presentation in which the subject reported whether the image was clear or blurred. Blur discrimination ability under all tested conditions was similar for both refractive error groups. Blur detection thresholds were 0.27+/-0.15 D (myopes) and 0.24+/-0.07 D (non-myopes) for text images. Thresholds were similar when measured with a one log unit reduction in lighting: 0.27+/-0.31 D compared to 0.23+/-0.14 D. Blur detection thresholds were greater for photographic scenes (myopes 0.41+/-0.36 D, non-myopes 0.44+/-0.36 D) and when only a single text image (myopes 0.51+/-0.21 D, non-myopes 0.59+/-0.01 D) was presented, but this increase was measured in both refractive error groups. There was no correlation between blur thresholds and refractive error magnitude, refractive error progression over the past year, or contrast sensitivity. We found that the blur detection ability showed greater individual variation in myopic children. Further work is required to determine whether blur detection ability is of relevance to myopia development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11809476     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00277-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

1.  Characteristics of accommodative behavior during sustained reading in emmetropes and myopes.

Authors:  Elise Harb; Frank Thorn; David Troilo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Blur Detection, Depth of Field, and Accommodation in Emmetropic and Hyperopic Children.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Scott B Stevenson; Julia S Benoit; Ruth E Manny; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Peripheral contrast sensitivity and attention in myopia.

Authors:  Kristen L Kerber; Frank Thorn; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Visual acuity measures do not reliably detect childhood refractive error--an epidemiological study.

Authors:  Lisa O'Donoghue; Alicja R Rudnicka; Julie F McClelland; Nicola S Logan; Kathryn J Saunders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Blur perception throughout the visual field in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Lenna Walker; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Retinal Responses to Simulated Optical Blur Using a Novel Dead Leaves ERG Stimulus.

Authors:  Athanasios Panorgias; Stephanie Aigbe; Emily Jeong; Carles Otero; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.799

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.