Literature DB >> 16544134

The influence of natural body sway on neuromuscular responses to an unpredictable surface translation.

Craig D Tokuno1, Mark G Carpenter, Alf Thorstensson, Andrew G Cresswell.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that the postural configuration adopted by a subject, such as active leaning, influences the postural response to an unpredictable support surface translation. While those studies have examined large differences in postural conditions, it is of additional interest to examine the effects of naturally occurring changes in standing posture. Thus, it was hypothesized that the normal postural sway observed during quiet standing would affect the responses to an unpredictable support surface translation. Seventeen young adults stood quietly on a moveable platform and were perturbed in either the forward or backward direction when the location of the center of pressure (COP) was either 1.5 standard deviations anterior or posterior to the mean baseline COP signal. Postural responses, in the form of electromyographic (EMG) latencies and amplitudes, were recorded from lower limb and trunk muscles. When the location of the COP at the time of the translation was in the opposite, as compared to the same, direction as the upcoming translation, there was a significantly earlier onset of the antagonists (10-23%, i.e. 15-45 ms) and a greater EMG amplitude (14-39%) in four of the six recorded muscles. Stepping responses were most frequently observed during trials where the position of the COP was opposite to the direction of the translation. The results support the hypothesis that postural responses to unpredictable support surface translations are influenced by the normal movements of postural sway. The results may help to explain the large variability of postural responses found between past studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16544134     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0414-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

1.  Ankle and hip postural strategies defined by joint torques.

Authors:  C F Runge; C L Shupert; F B Horak; F E Zajac
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 2.  The role of muscle receptors in the detection of movements.

Authors:  U Proske; A K Wise; J E Gregory
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Effect of ageing and vision on limb load asymmetry during quiet stance.

Authors:  J W Blaszczyk; F Prince; M Raiche; R Hébert
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  How do non-muscular torques contribute to the kinetics of postural recovery following a support surface translation?

Authors:  K E Bothner; J L Jensen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Cutaneous afferents from human plantar sole contribute to body posture awareness.

Authors:  Régine Roll; Anne Kavounoudias; Jean-Pierre Roll
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-10-28       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Kinematic and kinetic validity of the inverted pendulum model in quiet standing.

Authors:  William H Gage; David A Winter; James S Frank; Allan L Adkin
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Direction-specific postural instability in subjects with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Fay B Horak; Diana Dimitrova; John G Nutt
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  Importance of body sway velocity information in controlling ankle extensor activities during quiet stance.

Authors:  Kei Masani; Milos R Popovic; Kimitaka Nakazawa; Motoki Kouzaki; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Feedforward ankle strategy of balance during quiet stance in adults.

Authors:  P Gatev; S Thomas; T Kepple; M Hallett
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Postural adjustments in sitting humans following external perturbations: muscle activity and kinematics.

Authors:  H Forssberg; H Hirschfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  11 in total

1.  Trunk muscle coordination in reaction to load-release in a position without vertical postural demand.

Authors:  A E Martin Eriksson Crommert; Alf Thorstensson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Trunk muscle reactions to sudden unexpected and expected perturbations in the absence of upright postural demand.

Authors:  A E Martin Eriksson Crommert; Alf Thorstensson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Predicting dynamic postural instability using center of mass time-to-contact information.

Authors:  Christopher J Hasson; Richard E A Van Emmerik; Graham E Caldwell
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Human standing and walking: comparison of the effects of stimulation of the vestibular system.

Authors:  John F Iles; Richard Baderin; Rachel Tanner; Ariel Simon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Differential control of abdominal muscles during multi-directional support-surface translations in man.

Authors:  Mark G Carpenter; Craig D Tokuno; Alf Thorstensson; Andrew G Cresswell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Interactions between initial posture and task-level goal explain experimental variability in postural responses to perturbations of standing balance.

Authors:  Tom Van Wouwe; Lena H Ting; Friedl De Groote
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Can quiet standing posture predict compensatory postural adjustment?

Authors:  Gabriel Bueno Lahóz Moya; Cássio Marinho Siqueira; Renê Rogieri Caffaro; Carolina Fu; Clarice Tanaka
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  When standing on a moving support, cutaneous inputs provide sufficient information to plan the anticipatory postural adjustments for gait initiation.

Authors:  Laurence Mouchnino; Jean Blouin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mechanisms of motor adaptation in reactive balance control.

Authors:  Torrence D J Welch; Lena H Ting
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reactive Balance Control in Response to Perturbation in Unilateral Stance: Interaction Effects of Direction, Displacement and Velocity on Compensatory Neuromuscular and Kinematic Responses.

Authors:  Kathrin Freyler; Albert Gollhofer; Ralf Colin; Uli Brüderlin; Ramona Ritzmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.