Literature DB >> 15013500

Kinematic and kinetic validity of the inverted pendulum model in quiet standing.

William H Gage1, David A Winter, James S Frank, Allan L Adkin.   

Abstract

Movements of the whole-body center of mass during quiet standing have been estimated from measurements of body segment movements. These whole-body center of mass movements have been compared with movements of the center of mass as predicted from a simple inverted-pendulum model of standing. However, the total body center of mass is a weighted average of the center of mass of all individual body segments. The question arises as to how well the total body center of mass represents the individual segments and lower limb joint angles. This study focuses on the validity of how well the individual segments and lower limb angles temporally and spatially synchronize with the total body center of mass. Eleven healthy university students volunteered to participate. Kinematic data were collected using a 3D optoelectronic camera system; kinetic data were collected using a 3D force plate. Participants stood quietly, with eyes open, for 120 s. Segment and whole body centers of mass were calculated from a 14 segment, 3D bilateral model. Segment and joint angles were calculated for the lower limbs, bilaterally, and the trunk. Segment center of mass root-mean-square displacements were strongly correlated with center of mass height relative to the ankle joint and were synchronized, or temporally locked, to the movement of the whole body center of mass. Sagittal plane ankle angular displacements were highly correlated to sagittal plane center of mass movement; stronger correlations between body center of mass and lower limb angular displacement were observed, the result of compensatory knee joint angular displacements. These data support and extend the use of an inverted pendulum model to represent quiet standing postural control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15013500     DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00037-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  69 in total

1.  Effects of lumbar extensor fatigue and fatigue rate on postural sway.

Authors:  B S Davidson; M L Madigan; M A Nussbaum
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Improvement of quiet standing balance in patients with wallenberg syndrome after rehabilitation.

Authors:  Eun Hye Na; Tae Sik Yoon; Soo Jeong Han
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2011-12-30

3.  Vibratory noise to the fingertip enhances balance improvement associated with light touch.

Authors:  Fernando Henrique Magalhães; André Fabio Kohn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Automatic detection of motion artifacts in the ballistocardiogram measured on a modified bathroom scale.

Authors:  Richard M Wiard; Omer T Inan; Brian Argyres; Mozziyar Etemadi; Gregory T A Kovacs; Laurent Giovangrandi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Regional modulation of the ankle plantarflexor muscles associated with standing external perturbations across different directions.

Authors:  J W Cohen; A Gallina; T D Ivanova; T Vieira; D J McAndrew; S J Garland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  How attentional focus on body sway affects postural control during quiet standing.

Authors:  Nicolas Vuillerme; Gilel Nafati
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-10-08

7.  Auditory biofeedback substitutes for loss of sensory information in maintaining stance.

Authors:  Marco Dozza; Fay B Horak; Lorenzo Chiari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Development of a more robust tool for postural stability analysis of laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  Gyusung Lee; Adrian E Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The influence of natural body sway on neuromuscular responses to an unpredictable surface translation.

Authors:  Craig D Tokuno; Mark G Carpenter; Alf Thorstensson; Andrew G Cresswell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Postural control during kneeling.

Authors:  Rinaldo André Mezzarane; André Fabio Kohn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.