Literature DB >> 11165289

How do non-muscular torques contribute to the kinetics of postural recovery following a support surface translation?

K E Bothner1, J L Jensen.   

Abstract

The common platform translation paradigm used in balance control studies employs a disturbance event that applies non-muscular forces to the body for the duration of the disturbance. Previous research has explored the process of constructing the balance recovery by considering these perturbations to be trigger events, not events with an ongoing force application timeline. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of muscular and non-muscular torques on post-perturbation balance with particular interest in the role of the external perturbation in balance recovery. Five young adult males experienced backward translations of the support surface at three different speeds. Integration intervals were defined for each segment and angular impulses were calculated for a period of increasing angular momentum (destabilization), and a period of decreasing angular momentum (restabilization). Destabilization of distal segments was primarily due to impulse generated by the motion of the support surface. For the trunk, however, muscle and motion-dependent sources contributed most to increasing momentum. Restabilization of distal segments was achieved by muscle and platform impulses while trunk restabilization was achieved by muscle and motion-dependent terms in opposition to gravity. Increased platform speed resulted in increased muscular contribution only in the control of the trunk, while demand on distal musculature decreased with change in platform speed as the platform contribution to restabilization increased in these segments. Therefore, impulses from non-muscular sources, including the perturbation itself, are significant modifiers of the response to balance disturbances and must be accounted for in balance research.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11165289     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00161-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

1.  Deceleration affects anticipatory and reactive components of triggered postural responses.

Authors:  Mark G Carpenter; Alf Thorstensson; Andrew G Cresswell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The influence of natural body sway on neuromuscular responses to an unpredictable surface translation.

Authors:  Craig D Tokuno; Mark G Carpenter; Alf Thorstensson; Andrew G Cresswell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Responses to multi-directional surface translations involve redistribution of proximal versus distal strategies to maintain upright posture.

Authors:  Stephanie L Jones; Sharon M Henry; Christine C Raasch; Juvena R Hitt; Janice Y Bunn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Parallels in control of voluntary and perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp movements: EMG and kinematics.

Authors:  William H Gage; Karl F Zabjek; Stephen W Hill; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A feedback model explains the differential scaling of human postural responses to perturbation acceleration and velocity.

Authors:  Torrence D J Welch; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.