Literature DB >> 16532941

Calculation of effective dose from measurements of secondary neutron spectra and scattered photon dose from dynamic MLC IMRT for 6 MV, 15 MV, and 18 MV beam energies.

Rebecca M Howell1, Nolan E Hertel, Zhonglu Wang, Jesson Hutchinson, Gary D Fullerton.   

Abstract

Effective doses were calculated from the delivery of 6 MV, 15 MV, and 18 MV conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) prostate treatment plans. ICRP-60 tissue weighting factors were used for the calculations. Photon doses were measured in phantom for all beam energies. Neutron spectra were measured for 15 MV and 18 MV and ICRP-74 quality conversion factors used to calculate ambient dose equivalents. The ambient dose equivalents were corrected for each tissue using neutron depth dose data from the literature. The depth corrected neutron doses were then used as a measure of the neutron component of the ICRP protection quantity, organ equivalent dose. IMRT resulted in an increased photon dose to many organs. However, the IMRT treatments resulted in an overall decrease in effective dose compared to conventional radiotherapy. This decrease correlates to the ability of an intensity-modulated field to minimize dose to critical normal structures in close proximity to the treatment volume. In a comparison of the three beam energies used for the IMRT treatments, 6 MV resulted in the lowest effective dose, while 18 MV resulted in the highest effective dose. This is attributed to the large neutron contribution for 18 MV compared to no neutron contribution for 6 MV.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16532941     DOI: 10.1118/1.2140119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  30 in total

1.  Estimate of the uncertainties in the relative risk of secondary malignant neoplasms following proton therapy and intensity-modulated photon therapy.

Authors:  Jonas D Fontenot; Charles Bloch; David Followill; Uwe Titt; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Risk of second malignant neoplasm following proton versus intensity-modulated photon radiotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Rebecca M Howell; Sunil Krishnan; Sarah B Scarboro; Dragan Mirkovic; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Accuracy of out-of-field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system.

Authors:  Rebecca M Howell; Sarah B Scarboro; S F Kry; Derek Z Yaldo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Neutron spectra and dose equivalents calculated in tissue for high-energy radiation therapy.

Authors:  Stephen F Kry; Rebecca M Howell; Mohammad Salehpour; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  The effect of 6 and 15 MV on intensity-modulated radiation therapy prostate cancer treatment: plan evaluation, tumour control probability and normal tissue complication probability analysis, and the theoretical risk of secondary induced malignancies.

Authors:  M Hussein; S Aldridge; T Guerrero Urbano; A Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Effects of tertiary MLC configuration on secondary neutron spectra from 18 MV x-ray beams for the Varian 21EX linear accelerator.

Authors:  Rebecca M Howell; Stephen F Kry; Eric Burgett; David Followill; Nolan E Hertel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Secondary neutron spectra from modern Varian, Siemens, and Elekta linacs with multileaf collimators.

Authors:  Rebecca M Howell; Stephen F Kry; Eric Burgett; Nolan E Hertel; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Analytical model for out-of-field dose in photon craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Wassim Jalbout; Rebecca M Howell; Nabil Khater; Fady Geara; Kenneth Homann; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Monte Carlo modeling of a 6 and 18 MV Varian Clinac medical accelerator for in-field and out-of-field dose calculations: development and validation.

Authors:  Bryan Bednarz; X George Xu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Risk of second cancer from scattered radiation of intensity-modulated radiotherapies with lung cancer.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim; Weon Kuu Chung; Dongoh Shin; Seongeon Hong; Sung Ho Park; Sung-Yong Park; Kwangzoo Chung; Young Kyung Lim; Dongho Shin; Se Byeong Lee; Hyun-Ho Lee; Myonggeun Yoon
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.