Literature DB >> 16517649

A three-dimensional computer model of four hypothetical mechanisms protecting biofilms from antimicrobials.

Jason D Chambless1, Stephen M Hunt, Philip S Stewart.   

Abstract

Four hypothetical mechanisms for protection of biofilms against antimicrobials were incorporated into a three-dimensional model of biofilm growth and development. The model integrated processes of substrate utilization, diffusion, growth, cell migration, death, and detachment in a cellular automaton framework. Compared to simulations of unprotected biofilms, each of the protective mechanisms provided some tolerance to antimicrobial action. When the mechanisms were compared to each other, the behaviors of the four protective mechanisms produced distinct shapes of killing curves, nonuniform spatial patterns of survival and cell type distribution, and anticipated susceptibility patterns for dispersed biofilm cells. The differences between the protective mechanisms predicted in these simulations could guide the design of experiments to discriminate antimicrobial tolerance mechanisms in biofilms. Each of the mechanisms could be a plausible avenue of biofilm protection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16517649      PMCID: PMC1393201          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.72.3.2005-2013.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  41 in total

Review 1.  Riddle of biofilm resistance.

Authors:  K Lewis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Adaptive responses to antimicrobial agents in biofilms.

Authors:  Barbara Szomolay; Isaac Klapper; Jack Dockery; Phil S Stewart
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.491

3.  Modeling biocide action against biofilms.

Authors:  P S Stewart; M A Hamilton; B R Goldstein; B T Schneider
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1996-02-20       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Effects of biofilm structures on oxygen distribution and mass transport.

Authors:  D de Beer; P Stoodley; F Roe; Z Lewandowski
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Mathematical model of beta-lactam penetration into a biofilm of Pseudomonas aeruginosa while undergoing simultaneous inactivation by released beta-lactamases.

Authors:  G H Dibdin; S J Assinder; W W Nichols; P A Lambert
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Investigation of ciprofloxacin penetration into Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  P A Suci; M W Mittelman; F P Yu; G G Geesey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Biofilm accumulation model that predicts antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  P S Stewart
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Penetration of rifampin through Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms.

Authors:  Zhilan Zheng; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  The penetration of antibiotics into aggregates of mucoid and non-mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  W W Nichols; M J Evans; M P Slack; H L Walmsley
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1989-05

10.  Effect of biofilm culture upon the susceptibility of Staphylococcus epidermidis to tobramycin.

Authors:  I G Duguid; E Evans; M R Brown; P Gilbert
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Biofilms, a new approach to the microbiology of dental plaque.

Authors:  Jacob M ten Cate
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Modelling the spatial dynamics of plasmid transfer and persistence.

Authors:  Stephen M Krone; Ruinan Lu; Randal Fox; Haruo Suzuki; Eva M Top
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.777

3.  Failure of antibiotic treatment in microbial populations.

Authors:  Patrick De Leenheer; N G Cogan
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Effect of DNase and antibiotics on biofilm characteristics.

Authors:  George V Tetz; Natalia K Artemenko; Victor V Tetz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Challenges of biofilm control and utilization: lessons from mathematical modelling.

Authors:  Paulina A Dzianach; Gary A Dykes; Norval J C Strachan; Ken J Forbes; Francisco J Pérez-Reche
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 6.  Continuum and discrete approach in modeling biofilm development and structure: a review.

Authors:  M R Mattei; L Frunzo; B D'Acunto; Y Pechaud; F Pirozzi; G Esposito
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Extensive reduction of cell viability and enhanced matrix production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 flow biofilms treated with a D-amino acid mixture.

Authors:  Zoe Sanchez; Akio Tani; Kazuhide Kimbara
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Variable cell morphology approach for individual-based modeling of microbial communities.

Authors:  Tomas Storck; Cristian Picioreanu; Bernardino Virdis; Damien J Batstone
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Using surface plasmon resonance imaging to study bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Pegah N Abadian; Nil Tandogan; John J Jamieson; Edgar D Goluch
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.800

10.  Modeling the response of a biofilm to silver-based antimicrobial.

Authors:  A E Stine; D Nassar; J K Miller; C B Clemons; J P Wilber; G W Young; Y H Yun; C L Cannon; J G Leid; W J Youngs; A Milsted
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 2.144

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.