Literature DB >> 16011755

Adaptive responses to antimicrobial agents in biofilms.

Barbara Szomolay1, Isaac Klapper, Jack Dockery, Phil S Stewart.   

Abstract

Bacterial biofilms demonstrate adaptive resistance in response to antimicrobial stress more effectively than corresponding planktonic populations. We propose here that, in biofilms, reaction-diffusion limited penetration may result in only low levels of antimicrobial exposure to deeper regions of the biofilm. Sheltered cells are then able to enter an adapted resistant state if the local time scale for adaptation is faster than that for disinfection. This mechanism is not available to a planktonic population. A mathematical model is presented to illustrate. Results indicate that, for a sufficiently thick biofilm, cells in the biofilm implement adaptive responses more effectively than do freely suspended cells. Effective disinfection requires applied biocide concentration that increases quadratically or exponentially with biofilm thickness.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16011755     DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00797.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 1462-2912            Impact factor:   5.491


  33 in total

1.  Optimal control strategies for disinfection of bacterial populations with persister and susceptible dynamics.

Authors:  N G Cogan; Jason Brown; Kyle Darres; Katherine Petty
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Adaptive resistance and differential protein expression of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis biofilms exposed to benzalkonium chloride.

Authors:  Anil K Mangalappalli-Illathu; Darren R Korber
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Biofilms, a new approach to the microbiology of dental plaque.

Authors:  Jacob M ten Cate
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  A three-dimensional computer model of four hypothetical mechanisms protecting biofilms from antimicrobials.

Authors:  Jason D Chambless; Stephen M Hunt; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Failure of antibiotic treatment in microbial populations.

Authors:  Patrick De Leenheer; N G Cogan
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Nanoparticle deposition onto biofilms.

Authors:  J K Miller; R Neubig; C B Clemons; K L Kreider; J P Wilber; G W Young; A J Ditto; Y H Yun; A Milsted; H T Badawy; M J Panzner; W J Youngs; C L Cannon
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 7.  Continuum and discrete approach in modeling biofilm development and structure: a review.

Authors:  M R Mattei; L Frunzo; B D'Acunto; Y Pechaud; F Pirozzi; G Esposito
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Conceptual Model of Biofilm Antibiotic Tolerance That Integrates Phenomena of Diffusion, Metabolism, Gene Expression, and Physiology.

Authors:  Philip S Stewart; Ben White; Laura Boegli; Timothy Hamerly; Kerry S Williamson; Michael J Franklin; Brian Bothner; Garth A James; Steve Fisher; Francisco G Vital-Lopez; Anders Wallqvist
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Differential adaptive response and survival of Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis planktonic and biofilm cells exposed to benzalkonium chloride.

Authors:  Anil K Mangalappalli-Illathu; Sinisa Vidović; Darren R Korber
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Impact of sarA on antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus in a catheter-associated in vitro model of biofilm formation.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Weiss; Horace J Spencer; Sonja J Daily; Brian D Weiss; Mark S Smeltzer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.