Literature DB >> 16514664

Hip, knee, and ankle kinematics of high range of motion activities of daily living.

A Hemmerich1, H Brown, S Smith, S S K Marthandam, U P Wyss.   

Abstract

Treatment of joint disease that results in limited flexion is often rejected by patients in non-Western cultures whose activities of daily living require a higher range of motion at the hip, knee, or ankle. However, limited information is available about the joint kinematics required for high range of motion activities, such as squatting, kneeling, and sitting cross-legged, making it difficult to design prosthetic implants that will meet the needs of these populations. Therefore, the objective of this work was to generate three-dimensional kinematics at the hip, knee, and ankle joints of Indian subjects while performing activities of daily living. Thirty healthy Indian subjects (average age: 48.2 +/- 7.6 years) were asked to perform six trials of the following activities: squatting, kneeling, and sitting cross-legged. Floating axis angles were calculated at the joints using the kinematic data collected by an electromagnetic motion tracking device with receivers located on the subject's foot, shank, thigh, and sacrum. A mean maximum flexion of 157 degrees +/- 6 degrees at the knee joint was required for squatting with heels up. Mean maximum hip flexion angles reached up to 95 degrees +/- 27 degrees for squatting with heels flat. The high standard deviation associated with this activity underscored the large range in maximum hip flexion angles required by different subjects. Mean ankle range of flexion reached 58 degrees +/- 14 degrees for the sitting cross-legged activity. The ranges of motion required to perform the activities studied are greater than that provided by most currently available joint prostheses, demonstrating the need for high range of motion implant design. Copyright 2006 Orthopaedic Research Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16514664     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  48 in total

1.  In vivo knee kinematics during high flexion after a posterior-substituting total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Angela L Moynihan; Kartik M Varadarajan; George R Hanson; Sang-Eun Park; Kyung Wook Nha; Jeremy F Suggs; Todd Johnson; Guoan Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Motion performance and impingement risk of total hip arthroplasty with a simulation module.

Authors:  Hai Zhou; Cheng-tao Wang; Wen-ting Ji; Xiang-sen Zeng; Shu Fang; Dong-mei Wang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Are the long term results of a high-flex total knee replacement affected by the range of flexion?

Authors:  Shinichiro Nakamura; Hiromu Ito; Masahiko Kobayashi; Kenji Nakamura; Ueo Toyoji; Richard D Komistek; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  In vitro validation and reliability study of electromagnetic skin sensors for evaluation of end range of motion positions of the hip.

Authors:  E A Audenaert; L Vigneron; T Van Hoof; K D'Herde; G van Maele; D Oosterlinck; C Pattyn
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Change in collateral ligament length and tibiofemoral movement following joint line variation in TKA.

Authors:  Kun-Jhih Lin; Hung-Wen Wei; Chang-Hung Huang; Yu-Liang Liu; Wen-Chuan Chen; Colin Joseph McClean; Cheng-Kung Cheng
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Reliability and accuracy of a goniometer mobile device application for video measurement of the functional movement screen deep squat test.

Authors:  David A Krause; Michael S Boyd; Allison N Hager; Eric C Smoyer; Anthony T Thompson; John H Hollman
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-02

7.  What is the tolerated width of periacetabular osteophytes to avoid impingement in cementless THA?: a three-dimensional simulation study.

Authors:  Jung-Taek Kim; Jusung Lee; Young-Kyun Lee; Yong-Chan Ha; Ye-Yeon Won; Kunwoo Lee; Vikas Khanduja; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Optimal anterior femoral offset for functional range of motion in total hip arthroplasty--a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Masanobu Hirata; Yasuharu Nakashima; Daisuke Hara; Masayuki Kanazawa; Yusuke Kohno; Kensei Yoshimoto; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Intraoperative joint gaps affect postoperative range of motion in TKAs with posterior-stabilized prostheses.

Authors:  Toshifumi Watanabe; Takeshi Muneta; Ichiro Sekiya; Scott A Banks
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Maximal flexion and patient outcomes after TKA, using a bicruciate-stabilizing design.

Authors:  Nienke M Kosse; Petra J C Heesterbeek; Koen C Defoort; Ate B Wymenga; Gijs G van Hellemondt
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.