Literature DB >> 19270108

Long-term health outcomes of a decision aid: data from a randomized trial of adjuvant! In women with localized breast cancer.

Andrew J Vickers1, Elena B Elkin, Pamela B Peele, Maura Dickler, Laura A Siminoff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Women with localized breast cancer face difficult decisions about adjuvant therapy. Several decision aids are available to help women choose between treatment options. Decision aids are known to affect treatment choices and may therefore affect patient survival. The authors aimed to model the effects of the Adjuvant! decision aid on expected survival in women with early stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from a randomized trial of Adjuvant! (n = 395). To calculate the effects of the decision aid on survival, the authors used the Adjuvant! survival predictions as a surrogate endpoint. Data from each arm were entered separately into statistical models to estimate change in survival associated with receiving the Adjuvant! decision aid.
RESULTS: Most women (approximately 85%) chose a treatment option that maximized predicted survival. The effects of the decision aid on outcome could not be modeled because a small number of women (n = 12, 3%) chose treatment options associated with a large (5%-14%) loss in survival. These women-most typically estrogen receptor positive but refusing hormonal therapy-were equally divided between Adjuvant! and control groups and were not distinguished by medical or demographic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Expected benefit from treatment is a key variable in understanding patient behavior. A small number of women refuse adjuvant treatment associated with large increases in predicted survival, even when they are explicitly informed about the degree of benefit they would forgo. Investigation of the effects of decision aids on cancer survival is unlikely to be fruitful due to power considerations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19270108      PMCID: PMC3540794          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08329344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  20 in total

1.  Communicating the value of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Guru Sonpavde
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Trends in use of adjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy and tamoxifen for breast cancer in the United States: 1975-1999.

Authors:  Angela Mariotto; Eric J Feuer; Linda C Harlan; Lap-Ming Wun; Karen A Johnson; Jeffrey Abrams
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-11-06       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Adjuvant tamoxifen prescription in women 65 years and older with primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Silliman; Edward Guadagnoli; William Rakowski; Mary Beth Landrum; Timothy L Lash; Robert Wolf; Aliza Fink; Patricia A Ganz; Jerry Gurwitz; Catherine Borbas; Vincent Mor
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer.

Authors:  P M Ravdin; L A Siminoff; G J Davis; M B Mercer; J Hewlett; N Gerson; H L Parker
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Physicians' reasons for failing to deliver effective breast cancer care: a framework for underuse.

Authors:  Nina A Bickell; Mary Dee McEvoy
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Helping patients make informed choices: a randomized trial of a decision aid for adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Timothy Whelan; Carol Sawka; Mark Levine; Amiram Gafni; Leonard Reyno; Andrew Willan; Jim Julian; Susan Dent; Hakam Abu-Zahra; Edmond Chouinard; Richard Tozer; Kathleen Pritchard; Ilona Bodendorfer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Diffusion of aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer therapy between 1996 and 2003 in the Cancer Research Network.

Authors:  Erin J Aiello; Diana S M Buist; Edward H Wagner; Leah Tuzzio; Sarah M Greene; Lois E Lamerato; Terry S Field; Lisa J Herrinton; Reina Haque; Gene Hart; Kimberly J Bischoff; Ann M Geiger
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Someone to live for: social well-being, parenthood status, and decision-making in oncology.

Authors:  S B Yellen; D F Cella
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Discrepancy between consensus recommendations and actual community use of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Xianglin L Du; Charles R Key; Cynthia Osborne; Jonathan D Mahnken; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; D Stacey; V Entwistle; H Llewellyn-Thomas; D Rovner; M Holmes-Rovner; V Tait; J Tetroe; V Fiset; M Barry; J Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003
View more
  1 in total

1.  Side Effect Perceptions and Their Impact on Treatment Decisions in Women.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Thorsten Pachur; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-07-10       Impact factor: 2.583

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.