Literature DB >> 16510953

Dosimetric validation of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for photon dose calculation: fundamental characterization in water.

Antonella Fogliata1, Giorgia Nicolini, Eugenio Vanetti, Alessandro Clivio, Luca Cozzi.   

Abstract

In July 2005 a new algorithm was released by Varian Medical Systems for the Eclipse planning system and installed in our institute. It is the anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) for photon dose calculations, a convolution/superposition model for the first time implemented in a Varian planning system. It was therefore necessary to perform validation studies at different levels with a wide investigation approach. To validate the basic performances of the AAA, a detailed analysis of data computed by the AAA configuration algorithm was carried out and data were compared against measurements. To better appraise the performance of AAA and the capability of its configuration to tailor machine-specific characteristics, data obtained from the pencil beam convolution (PBC) algorithm implemented in Eclipse were also added in the comparison. Since the purpose of the paper is to address the basic performances of the AAA and of its configuration procedures, only data relative to measurements in water will be reported. Validation was carried out for three beams: 6 MV and 15 MV from a Clinac 2100C/D and 6 MV from a Clinac 6EX. Generally AAA calculations reproduced very well measured data, and small deviations were observed, on average, for all the quantities investigated for open and wedged fields. In particular, percentage depth-dose curves showed on average differences between calculation and measurement smaller than 1% or 1 mm, and computed profiles in the flattened region matched measurements with deviations smaller than 1% for all beams, field sizes, depths and wedges. Percentage differences in output factors were observed as small as 1% on average (with a range smaller than +/-2%) for all conditions. Additional tests were carried out for enhanced dynamic wedges with results comparable to previous results. The basic dosimetric validation of the AAA was therefore considered satisfactory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16510953     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/6/004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  40 in total

1.  Accuracy of out-of-field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system.

Authors:  Rebecca M Howell; Sarah B Scarboro; S F Kry; Derek Z Yaldo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  The effect of slice thickness on target and organs at risk volumes, dosimetric coverage and radiobiological impact in IMRT planning.

Authors:  S P Srivastava; C-W Cheng; I J Das
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Beam rate influence on dose distribution and fluence map in IMRT dynamic technique.

Authors:  Krzysztof Slosarek; Aleksandra Grządziel; Wojciech Osewski; Lukasz Dolla; Barbara Bekman; Borislava Petrovic
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-02-10

Review 4.  Impact of dose calculation algorithm on radiation therapy.

Authors:  Wen-Zhou Chen; Ying Xiao; Jun Li
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-28

Review 5.  Emerging role of MRI in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hersh Chandarana; Hesheng Wang; R H N Tijssen; Indra J Das
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Application of Metal Implant 16-Bit Imaging: New Technique in Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ni Xin-Ye; Gao Liugang; Fang Mingming; Lin Tao
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-06-23

7.  On the dosimetric impact of inhomogeneity management in the Acuros XB algorithm for breast treatment.

Authors:  Antonella Fogliata; Giorgia Nicolini; Alessandro Clivio; Eugenio Vanetti; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  A method of dose reconstruction for moving targets compatible with dynamic treatments.

Authors:  Per Rugaard Poulsen; Mai Lykkegaard Schmidt; Paul Keall; Esben Schjodt Worm; Walther Fledelius; Lone Hoffmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Accuracy of dose calculation algorithms for virtual heterogeneous phantoms and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the head and neck.

Authors:  Ryota Onizuka; Fujio Araki; Takeshi Ohno; Yuji Nakaguchi; Yudai Kai; Yuuki Tomiyama; Kazunari Hioki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-01

10.  Risk of secondary cancers from scattered radiation during intensity-modulated radiotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim; Kwangzoo Chung; Weon Kuu Chung; Sun Hyun Bae; Dong Oh Shin; Seongeon Hong; Sung Ho Park; Sung-Yong Park; Chae-Seon Hong; Young Kyung Lim; Dongho Shin; Se Byeong Lee; Hyun-ho Lee; Jiwon Sung; Myonggeun Yoon
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.