Literature DB >> 25388875

Reduced microsatellite heterozygosity does not affect natal dispersal in three contrasting roe deer populations.

Cécile Vanpé1, Lucie Debeffe2,3, A J Mark Hewison3, Erwan Quéméré3, Jean-François Lemaître2, Maxime Galan3,4, Britany Amblard2,4, François Klein5, Bruno Cargnelutti3, Gilles Capron6, Joël Merlet3, Claude Warnant5, Jean-Michel Gaillard2.   

Abstract

Although theoretical studies have predicted a link between individual multilocus heterozygosity and dispersal, few empirical studies have investigated the effect of individual heterozygosity on dispersal propensity or distance. We investigated this link using measures of heterozygosity at 12 putatively neutral microsatellite markers and natal dispersal behaviour in three contrasting populations of European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), a species displaying pre-saturation condition-dependent natal dispersal. We found no effect of individual heterozygosity on either dispersal propensity or dispersal distance. Average heterozygosity was similar across the three studied populations, but dispersal propensity and distance differed markedly among them. In Aurignac, dispersal propensity and distance were positively related to individual body mass, whereas there was no detectable effect of body mass on dispersal behaviour in Chizé and Trois Fontaines. We suggest that we should expect both dispersal propensity and distance to be greater when heterozygosity is lower only in those species where dispersal behaviour is driven by density-dependent competition for resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25388875     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-014-3139-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  50 in total

1.  Experimental evidence for density-dependence of home-range size in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.): a comparison of two long-term studies.

Authors:  P Kjellander; A J M Hewison; O Liberg; J-M Angibault; E Bideau; B Cargnelutti
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics.

Authors:  Diana E Bowler; Tim G Benton
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-05

3.  Joint evolution of dispersal and inbreeding load.

Authors:  Frédéric Guillaume; Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Heterozygosity-fitness correlations revealed by neutral and candidate gene markers in roe deer from a long-term study.

Authors:  Anne Da Silva; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Nigel G Yoccoz; A J Mark Hewison; Max Galan; Tim Coulson; Dominique Allainé; Laurence Vial; Daniel Delorme; Guy Van Laere; François Klein; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations.

Authors:  Jean Clobert; Jean-François Le Galliard; Julien Cote; Sandrine Meylan; Manuel Massot
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in zebra finches: microsatellite markers can be better than their reputation.

Authors:  Wolfgang Forstmeier; Holger Schielzeth; Jakob C Mueller; Hans Ellegren; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Evaluating the role of inbreeding depression in heterozygosity-fitness correlations: how useful are tests for identity disequilibrium?

Authors:  Marty Kardos; Fred W Allendorf; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 7.090

8.  Landscape fragmentation generates spatial variation of diet composition and quality in a generalist herbivore.

Authors:  Frial Abbas; Nicolas Morellet; A J Mark Hewison; Joël Merlet; Bruno Cargnelutti; Bruno Lourtet; Jean-Marc Angibault; Tanguy Daufresne; Stéphane Aulagnier; Hélène Verheyden
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  How does climate change influence demographic processes of widespread species? Lessons from the comparative analysis of contrasted populations of roe deer.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Gaillard; A J Mark Hewison; François Klein; Floriane Plard; Mathieu Douhard; Raziel Davison; Christophe Bonenfant
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  Temporal dynamics of genetic variability in a mountain goat (Oreamnos americanus) population.

Authors:  Joaquín Ortego; Glenn Yannic; Aaron B A Shafer; Julien Mainguy; Marco Festa-Bianchet; David W Coltman; Steeve D Côté
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  1 in total

1.  Landscape homogenization due to agricultural intensification disrupts the relationship between reproductive success and main prey abundance in an avian predator.

Authors:  Petra Sumasgutner; Julien Terraube; Aurélie Coulon; Alexandre Villers; Nayden Chakarov; Luise Kruckenhauser; Erkki Korpimäki
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 3.172

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.