Literature DB >> 21518074

Rural children's exposure to well water contaminants: implications in light of the American Academy of Pediatrics' recent policy statement.

Julie Postma1, Philip W Butterfield, Tamara Odom-Maryon, Wade Hill, Patricia G Butterfield.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Implementing the recent American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) policy for annual well water testing will impact pediatric healthcare providers, who will be called upon for advice regarding testing, interpretation, and mitigation. We report findings from a study of low-income rural families' participation in household well water testing. DATA SOURCES: We collected data from 188 rural low-income households inclusive of 320 children under the age of seven. Participating families lived in one of two western U.S. counties and received water from a well with <15 connections. Household water samples and questionnaire data were collected for analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-seven percent of households tested positive for at least one contaminant, including total coliforms (18%), arsenic (6%), synthetic organic chemicals (6%), nitrates (2%), fluoride (2%), and E. coli (<1%). Eighty-nine percent of households testing positive for total coliforms were positive at re-test. Respondents expressed greatest concern for biological contamination and took multiple precautionary actions, although only 31% had ever tested their water for contaminants. Higher levels of education, income, and age, as well as homeowner status, were significantly associated with previous testing. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Recommendations for communicating abnormal results, mitigating risks, and overcoming logistical challenges are presented. ©2011 The Author(s) Journal compilation ©2011 American Academy of Nurse Practitioners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21518074      PMCID: PMC3190600          DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2011.00609.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Nurse Pract        ISSN: 1041-2972


  9 in total

1.  Combining occurrence and toxicity information to identify priorities for drinking-water mixture research.

Authors:  Sarah J Ryker; Mitchell J Small
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Treating and drinking well water in the presence of health risks from arsenic contamination: results from a U.S. hot spot.

Authors:  W Douglass Shaw; Mark Walker; Marnee Benson
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Tri-county comprehensive assessment of risk factors for sporadic reportable bacterial enteric infection in children.

Authors:  Donna M Denno; William E Keene; Carolyn M Hutter; Jennifer K Koepsell; Marianne Patnode; Denny Flodin-Hursh; Laurie K Stewart; Jeffrey S Duchin; Laurette Rasmussen; Robert Jones; Phillip I Tarr
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Drinking water from private wells and risks to children.

Authors:  Walter J Rogan; Michael T Brady
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Drinking water from private wells and risks to children.

Authors:  Walter J Rogan; Michael T Brady
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Workgroup report: Drinking-water nitrate and health--recent findings and research needs.

Authors:  Mary H Ward; Theo M deKok; Patrick Levallois; Jean Brender; Gabriel Gulis; Bernard T Nolan; James VanDerslice
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Public perceptions of drinking water: a postal survey of residents with private water supplies.

Authors:  Andria Q Jones; Catherine E Dewey; Kathryn Doré; Shannon E Majowicz; Scott A McEwen; Waltner-Toews David; Mathews Eric; Deborah J Carr; Spencer J Henson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  Mechanisms underlying Children's susceptibility to environmental toxicants.

Authors:  E M Faustman; S M Silbernagel; R A Fenske; T M Burbacher; R A Ponce
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Understanding the human health effects of chemical mixtures.

Authors:  David O Carpenter; Kathleen Arcaro; David C Spink
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Lessons Learned from Arsenic Mitigation among Private Well Households.

Authors:  Yan Zheng
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-09

2.  At the crossroads: Hazard assessment and reduction of health risks from arsenic in private well waters of the northeastern United States and Atlantic Canada.

Authors:  Yan Zheng; Joseph D Ayotte
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Prepubertal exposure to arsenic(III) suppresses circulating insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) delaying sexual maturation in female rats.

Authors:  Michael P Reilly; James C Saca; Alina Hamilton; Rene F Solano; Jesse R Rivera; Wendy Whitehouse-Innis; Jason G Parsons; Robert K Dearth
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.143

4.  A Community-Driven Intervention in Tuftonboro, New Hampshire, Succeeds in Altering Water Testing Behavior.

Authors:  Michael P Paul; Pierce Rigrod; Steve Wingate; Mark E Borsuk
Journal:  J Environ Health       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.179

Review 5.  Realist review of policy intervention studies aimed at reducing exposures to environmental hazards in the United States.

Authors:  Dorie E Apollonio; Nicole Wolfe; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Community Engaged Cumulative Risk Assessment of Exposure to Inorganic Well Water Contaminants, Crow Reservation, Montana.

Authors:  Margaret J Eggers; John T Doyle; Myra J Lefthand; Sara L Young; Anita L Moore-Nall; Larry Kindness; Roberta Other Medicine; Timothy E Ford; Eric Dietrich; Albert E Parker; Joseph H Hoover; Anne K Camper
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Factors influencing perceptions of private water quality in North America: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abraham Munene; David C Hall
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-10

8.  Risk Communication and Factors Influencing Private Well Testing Behavior: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sarah K Colley; Peter K M Kane; Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Review of built and natural environment stressors impacting American-Indian/Alaska-Native children.

Authors:  Nirmalla Barros; Nicolle S Tulve; Daniel T Heggem; Ken Bailey
Journal:  Rev Environ Health       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.022

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.