Literature DB >> 17703286

Asymmetric interlimb transfer of concurrent adaptation to opposing dynamic forces.

J M Galea1, R C Miall, D G Woolley.   

Abstract

Interlimb transfer of a novel dynamic force has been well documented. It has also been shown that unimanual adaptation to opposing novel environments is possible if they are associated with different workspaces. The main aim of this study was to test if adaptation to opposing velocity dependent viscous forces with one arm could improve the initial performance of the other arm. The study also examined whether this interlimb transfer occurred across an extrinsic, spatial, coordinative system or an intrinsic, joint based, coordinative system. Subjects initially adapted to opposing viscous forces separated by target location. Our measure of performance was the correlation between the speed profiles of each movement within a force condition and an 'average' trajectory within null force conditions. Adaptation to the opposing forces was seen during initial acquisition with a significantly improved coefficient in epoch eight compared to epoch one. We then tested interlimb transfer from the dominant to non-dominant arm (D --> ND) and vice-versa (ND --> D) across either an extrinsic or intrinsic coordinative system. Interlimb transfer was only seen from the dominant to the non-dominant limb across an intrinsic coordinative system. These results support previous studies involving adaptation to a single dynamic force but also indicate that interlimb transfer of multiple opposing states is possible. This suggests that the information available at the level of representation allowing interlimb transfer can be more intricate than a general movement goal or a single perceived directional error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17703286      PMCID: PMC3032218          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1069-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

1.  Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand.

Authors:  Rieko Osu; Satomi Hirai; Toshinori Yoshioka; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-01-25       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Limitations in interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm.

Authors:  P Dizio; J R Lackner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Electromyographic correlates of learning an internal model of reaching movements.

Authors:  K A Thoroughman; R Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Acquisition and contextual switching of multiple internal models for different viscous force fields.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Wada; Yasuhiro Kawabata; Shinya Kotosaka; Kenji Yamamoto; Shigeru Kitazawa; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.304

View more
  12 in total

1.  Intermanual transfer characteristics of dynamic learning: direction, coordinate frame, and consolidation of interlimb generalization.

Authors:  Christian Stockinger; Benjamin Thürer; Anne Focke; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  To transfer or not to transfer? Kinematics and laterality quotient predict interlimb transfer of motor learning.

Authors:  Hannah Z Lefumat; Jean-Louis Vercher; R Chris Miall; Jonathan Cole; Frank Buloup; Lionel Bringoux; Christophe Bourdin; Fabrice R Sarlegna
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Generalization and transfer of contextual cues in motor learning.

Authors:  A M E Sarwary; D F Stegeman; L P J Selen; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Visuomotor adaptation and intermanual transfer under different viewing conditions.

Authors:  Amaris K Balitsky Thompson; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A dissociation between visual and motor workspace inhibits generalization of visuomotor adaptation across the limbs.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Lateralized motor control processes determine asymmetry of interlimb transfer.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer; Vivek Yadav
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  The extent of interlimb transfer following adaptation to a novel visuomotor condition does not depend on awareness of the condition.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Mukta Joshi; Yuming Lei
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Interlimb transfer of motor skill learning during walking: No evidence for asymmetric transfer.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Rajiv Ranganathan; Manik Tetarbe
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Different Patterns of Neural Activity Characterize Motor Skill Performance During Acquisition and Retention.

Authors:  Dorsa Beroukhim-Kay; Bokkyu Kim; John Monterosso; Rebecca Lewthwaite; Carolee Winstein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.473

10.  Substantial generalization of sensorimotor learning from bilateral to unilateral movement conditions.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Yuming Lei; Khongchee Xiong; Katie Marek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.