Literature DB >> 16504223

Parietal updating of limb posture: an event-related fMRI study.

Asa Pellijeff1, Leonardo Bonilha, Paul S Morgan, Kirsten McKenzie, Stephen R Jackson.   

Abstract

The posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is thought to integrate different kinds of sensory information (e.g., visual, auditory, somatosensory) to produce multiple representations of space that are each associated with different types or combinations of action; such as saccadic eye movements and reaching or grasping movements of the upper limb. Lesion studies in monkeys and in humans have shown that reaching movements to visually defined and to posturally defined targets can be dissociated from one another; indicating that different regions of the parietal cortex may code the same movement in either extrinsic (visual) or intrinsic (postural) coordinates. These studies also suggest that regions within the posterior parietal cortex play an important role in maintaining an accurate and up-to-date representation of the current postural state of the body (the body schema). We used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate those brain areas involved in maintaining and updating postural (i.e., non-visual) representations of the upper limb that participate in the accurate control of reaching movements. We show that a change in the posture of the upper-limb is associated with a significant increase in BOLD activation in only one brain region--the superior parietal cortex, particularly the medial aspect (precuneus). We note that this finding is consistent with the suggestion, based upon human neurological investigations and monkey electrophysiology, that this region of the PPC may participate in the dynamic representation of the body schema, and is the most likely location for damage leading to errors in visually guided reaching to non-foveated target locations. We also note that this brain area corresponds to a region of PPC recently identified as the human homologue of the Parietal Reach Region (PRR) observed in the monkey brain that has been thought to represent reaching movements in eye-centred coordinates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16504223     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  52 in total

1.  Grab an object with a tool and change your body: tool-use-dependent changes of body representation for action.

Authors:  Lucilla Cardinali; Stéphane Jacobs; Claudio Brozzoli; Francesca Frassinetti; Alice C Roy; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Dynamic changes in the perceived posture of the hand during ischaemic anaesthesia of the arm.

Authors:  N Inui; L D Walsh; J L Taylor; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Frontoparietal involvement in passively guided shape and length discrimination: a comparison between subcortical stroke patients and healthy controls.

Authors:  Ann Van de Winckel; Nicole Wenderoth; Willy De Weerdt; Stefan Sunaert; Ron Peeters; Wim Van Hecke; Vincent Thijs; Stephan P Swinnen; Carlo Perfetti; Hilde Feys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Body posture affects tactile discrimination and identification of fingers and hands.

Authors:  Martin Riemer; Jörg Trojan; Dieter Kleinböhl; Rupert Hölzl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Interaction between gaze and visual and proprioceptive position judgements.

Authors:  Katja Fiehler; Frank Rösler; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visual feedback and self-monitoring of sign language.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Rain Bosworth; Tanya Kraljic
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

Review 7.  Specialization of reach function in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Michael Vesia; J Douglas Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Different damping responses explain vertical endpoint error differences between visual conditions.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Chelsea M Soebbing; Allyson E French; Sara A Winges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  The mirror illusion's effects on body state estimation.

Authors:  Tamer M Soliman; Laurel J Buxbaum; Steven A Jax
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Activation shift in elderly subjects across functional systems: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Christian Roski; Svenja Caspers; Silke Lux; Felix Hoffstaedter; René Bergs; Katrin Amunts; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.