Literature DB >> 20428855

Interaction between gaze and visual and proprioceptive position judgements.

Katja Fiehler1, Frank Rösler, Denise Y P Henriques.   

Abstract

There is considerable evidence that targets for action are represented in a dynamic gaze-centered frame of reference, such that each gaze shift requires an internal updating of the target. Here, we investigated the effect of eye movements on the spatial representation of targets used for position judgements. Participants had their hand passively placed to a location, and then judged whether this location was left or right of a remembered visual or remembered proprioceptive target, while gaze direction was varied. Estimates of position of the remembered targets relative to the unseen position of the hand were assessed with an adaptive psychophysical procedure. These positional judgements significantly varied relative to gaze for both remembered visual and remembered proprioceptive targets. Our results suggest that relative target positions may also be represented in eye-centered coordinates. This implies similar spatial reference frames for action control and space perception when positions are coded relative to the hand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20428855     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2251-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  51 in total

1.  Hand-centred coding of target location in visuo-spatial working memory.

Authors:  S Chieffi; D A Allport; M Woodin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Proprioception does not quickly drift during visual occlusion.

Authors:  M Desmurget; P Vindras; H Gréa; P Viviani; S T Grafton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.

Authors:  J R Duhamel; C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance.

Authors:  Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Transformation from head- to shoulder-centered representation of target direction in arm movements.

Authors:  J F Soechting; S I Tillery; M Flanders
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Eye position affects the perceived location of touch.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The precision of proprioceptive position sense.

Authors:  R J van Beers; A C Sittig; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Two cortical systems for reaching in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Jérôme Prado; Simon Clavagnier; Hélène Otzenberger; Christian Scheiber; Henry Kennedy; Marie-Thérèse Perenin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Optimal integration of visual and proprioceptive movement information for the perception of trajectory geometry.

Authors:  Johanna Reuschel; Knut Drewing; Denise Y P Henriques; Frank Rösler; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Systematic retinotopic reaching error vectors in unilateral optic ataxia.

Authors:  Annabelle Blangero; Hisaaki Ota; Yves Rossetti; Toshikatsu Fujii; Hiroya Ohtake; Michio Tabuchi; Alain Vighetto; Atsushi Yamadori; Philippe Vindras; Laure Pisella
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  13 in total

1.  Retinotopic memory is more precise than spatiotopic memory.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Perceived touch location is coded using a gaze signal.

Authors:  Lisa M Pritchett; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Reference frames for coding touch location depend on the task.

Authors:  Lisa M Pritchett; Michael J Carnevale; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Development of interactions between sensorimotor representations in school-aged children.

Authors:  Florian A Kagerer; Jane E Clark
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  The effects of immediate vision on implicit hand maps.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Spatial updating depends on gaze direction even after loss of vision.

Authors:  Johanna Reuschel; Frank Rösler; Denise Y P Henriques; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Choice of Human-Computer Interaction Mode in Stroke Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Hossein Mousavi Hondori; Maryam Khademi; Lucy Dodakian; Alison McKenzie; Cristina V Lopes; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Behavioral investigation on the frames of reference involved in visuomotor transformations during peripheral arm reaching.

Authors:  Ettore Ambrosini; Marco Ciavarro; Gina Pelle; Mauro Gianni Perrucci; Gaspare Galati; Patrizia Fattori; Claudio Galletti; Giorgia Committeri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sensorimotor recalibration depends on attribution of sensory prediction errors to internal causes.

Authors:  Carlo Wilke; Matthis Synofzik; Axel Lindner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  When kinesthesia becomes visual: a theoretical justification for executing motor tasks in visual space.

Authors:  Michele Tagliabue; Joseph McIntyre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.