Literature DB >> 16492843

The impact of continuous pulse oximetry monitoring on intensive care unit admissions from a postsurgical care floor.

E Andrew Ochroch1, Michael W Russell, William C Hanson, Gayle A Devine, Andrew J Cucchiara, Mark G Weiner, Sanford J Schwartz.   

Abstract

Continuous pulse oximetry (CPOX) has the potential to increase vigilance and decrease pulmonary complications and thus decrease intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. In a randomized nonblinded study of 1219 subjects we compared the effects of CPOX and standard monitoring on the rate of transfer to an ICU from a 33-bed postcardiothoracic surgery care floor. There was no difference in the rate of ICU readmission between the CPOX and standard monitor groups. Despite older age and comorbidity, estimated cost to time of censoring (enrollment to completion of the study) was less in the monitored patients who required ICU transfer than in the unmonitored patients who required ICU transfer (mean estimated cost difference of 28,195 dollars; P = 0.04). Use of CPOX altered the reasons that patients were transferred to an ICU but did not affect the rate of transfer. The duration, and thus estimated cost, of ICU stay was significantly less in the CPOX-monitored group. The potential for CPOX to allow for early intervention, or perhaps prevention of pulmonary complications, needs to be explored. Routine CPOX monitoring did not reduce transfer to ICU, mortality, or overall estimated cost of hospitalization, and it is unclear if there is any real benefit from the application of this technology in patients on a general care floor who are recovering from cardiothoracic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16492843     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000195583.76486.c4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  12 in total

Review 1.  What type of monitoring has been shown to improve outcomes in acutely ill patients?

Authors:  Gustavo A Ospina-Tascón; Ricardo L Cordioli; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-01-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Is pulse oximetry an essential tool or just another distraction? The role of the pulse oximeter in modern anesthesia care.

Authors:  Amit Shah; Kirk H Shelley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Prevalence of Continuous Pulse Oximetry Monitoring in Hospitalized Children With Bronchiolitis Not Requiring Supplemental Oxygen.

Authors:  Christopher P Bonafide; Rui Xiao; Patrick W Brady; Christopher P Landrigan; Canita Brent; Courtney Benjamin Wolk; Amanda P Bettencourt; Lisa McLeod; Frances Barg; Rinad S Beidas; Amanda Schondelmeyer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  A risk stratification algorithm using non-invasive respiratory volume monitoring to improve safety when using post-operative opioids in the PACU.

Authors:  Christopher Voscopoulos; Kimberly Theos; H A Tillmann Hein; Edward George
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  Pulse oximetry for perioperative monitoring.

Authors:  Tom Pedersen; Amanda Nicholson; Karen Hovhannisyan; Ann Merete Møller; Andrew F Smith; Sharon R Lewis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-17

6.  Patterns of unexpected in-hospital deaths: a root cause analysis.

Authors:  Lawrence A Lynn; J Paul Curry
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2011-02-11

Review 7.  Pulse oximetry.

Authors:  Amal Jubran
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Postoperative Hypoxemia Is Common and Persistent: A Prospective Blinded Observational Study.

Authors:  Zhuo Sun; Daniel I Sessler; Jarrod E Dalton; P J Devereaux; Aram Shahinyan; Amanda J Naylor; Matthew T Hutcherson; Patrick S Finnegan; Vikas Tandon; Saeed Darvish-Kazem; Shaan Chugh; Hussain Alzayer; Andrea Kurz
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 9.  Non-Invasive Continuous Respiratory Monitoring on General Hospital Wards: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kim van Loon; Bas van Zaane; Els J Bosch; Cor J Kalkman; Linda M Peelen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  A critical assessment of monitoring practices, patient deterioration, and alarm fatigue on inpatient wards: a review.

Authors:  J Paul Curry; Carla R Jungquist
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2014-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.