Christopher P Bonafide1,2,3,4, Rui Xiao5, Patrick W Brady6,7,8, Christopher P Landrigan9,10, Canita Brent1, Courtney Benjamin Wolk11,12, Amanda P Bettencourt13,14, Lisa McLeod15,16, Frances Barg17, Rinad S Beidas11,12,18, Amanda Schondelmeyer6,7,8. 1. Section of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 5. Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 6. Division of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 7. James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 8. Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio. 9. Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Massachusetts. 10. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 11. Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 12. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Penn Implementation Science Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 13. Department of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor. 14. National Clinician Scholars Program and TACTICAL Scholar, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 15. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, Denver. 16. Array BioPharma, Boulder, Colorado. 17. Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 18. Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Abstract
Importance: US national guidelines discourage the use of continuous pulse oximetry monitoring in hospitalized children with bronchiolitis who do not require supplemental oxygen. Objective: Measure continuous pulse oximetry use in children with bronchiolitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter cross-sectional study was performed in pediatric wards in 56 US and Canadian hospitals in the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings Network from December 1, 2018, through March 31, 2019. Participants included a convenience sample of patients aged 8 weeks through 23 months with bronchiolitis who were not receiving active supplemental oxygen administration. Patients with extreme prematurity, cyanotic congenital heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, home respiratory support, neuromuscular disease, immunodeficiency, or cancer were excluded. Exposures: Hospitalization with bronchiolitis without active supplemental oxygen administration. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome, receipt of continuous pulse oximetry, was measured using direct observation. Continuous pulse oximetry use percentages were risk standardized using the following variables: nighttime (11 pm to 7 am), age combined with preterm birth, time after weaning from supplemental oxygen or flow, apnea or cyanosis during the present illness, neurologic impairment, and presence of an enteral feeding tube. Results: The sample included 3612 patient observations in 33 freestanding children's hospitals, 14 children's hospitals within hospitals, and 9 community hospitals. In the sample, 59% were male, 56% were white, and 15% were black; 48% were aged 8 weeks through 5 months, 28% were aged 6 through 11 months, 16% were aged 12 through 17 months, and 9% were aged 18 through 23 months. The overall continuous pulse oximetry monitoring use percentage in these patients, none of whom were receiving any supplemental oxygen or nasal cannula flow, was 46% (95% CI, 40%-53%). Hospital-level unadjusted continuous pulse oximetry use ranged from 2% to 92%. After risk standardization, use ranged from 6% to 82%. Intraclass correlation coefficient suggested that 27% (95% CI, 19%-36%) of observed variation was attributable to unmeasured hospital-level factors. Conclusions and Relevance: In a convenience sample of children hospitalized with bronchiolitis who were not receiving active supplemental oxygen administration, monitoring with continuous pulse oximetry was frequent and varied widely among hospitals. Because of the apparent absence of a guideline- or evidence-based indication for continuous monitoring in this population, this practice may represent overuse.
Importance: US national guidelines discourage the use of continuous pulse oximetry monitoring in hospitalized children with bronchiolitis who do not require supplemental oxygen. Objective: Measure continuous pulse oximetry use in children with bronchiolitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter cross-sectional study was performed in pediatric wards in 56 US and Canadian hospitals in the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings Network from December 1, 2018, through March 31, 2019. Participants included a convenience sample of patients aged 8 weeks through 23 months with bronchiolitis who were not receiving active supplemental oxygen administration. Patients with extreme prematurity, cyanotic congenital heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, home respiratory support, neuromuscular disease, immunodeficiency, or cancer were excluded. Exposures: Hospitalization with bronchiolitis without active supplemental oxygen administration. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome, receipt of continuous pulse oximetry, was measured using direct observation. Continuous pulse oximetry use percentages were risk standardized using the following variables: nighttime (11 pm to 7 am), age combined with preterm birth, time after weaning from supplemental oxygen or flow, apnea or cyanosis during the present illness, neurologic impairment, and presence of an enteral feeding tube. Results: The sample included 3612 patient observations in 33 freestanding children's hospitals, 14 children's hospitals within hospitals, and 9 community hospitals. In the sample, 59% were male, 56% were white, and 15% were black; 48% were aged 8 weeks through 5 months, 28% were aged 6 through 11 months, 16% were aged 12 through 17 months, and 9% were aged 18 through 23 months. The overall continuous pulse oximetry monitoring use percentage in these patients, none of whom were receiving any supplemental oxygen or nasal cannula flow, was 46% (95% CI, 40%-53%). Hospital-level unadjusted continuous pulse oximetry use ranged from 2% to 92%. After risk standardization, use ranged from 6% to 82%. Intraclass correlation coefficient suggested that 27% (95% CI, 19%-36%) of observed variation was attributable to unmeasured hospital-level factors. Conclusions and Relevance: In a convenience sample of children hospitalized with bronchiolitis who were not receiving active supplemental oxygen administration, monitoring with continuous pulse oximetry was frequent and varied widely among hospitals. Because of the apparent absence of a guideline- or evidence-based indication for continuous monitoring in this population, this practice may represent overuse.
Authors: Eric R Coon; Ricardo A Quinonez; Daniel J Morgan; Sanket S Dhruva; Timmy Ho; Nathan Money; Alan R Schroeder Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Ricardo A Quinonez; Matthew D Garber; Alan R Schroeder; Brian K Alverson; Wendy Nickel; Jenna Goldstein; Jeffrey S Bennett; Bryan R Fine; Timothy H Hartzog; Heather S McLean; Vineeta Mittal; Rita M Pappas; Jack M Percelay; Shannon C Phillips; Mark Shen; Shawn L Ralston Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2013-08-19 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Shawn L Ralston; Matthew D Garber; Elizabeth Rice-Conboy; Grant M Mussman; Kristin A Shadman; Susan C Walley; Elizabeth Nichols Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kohei Hasegawa; Yusuke Tsugawa; David F M Brown; Jonathan M Mansbach; Carlos A Camargo Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Irit R Rasooly; Rinad S Beidas; Courtney Benjamin Wolk; Frances Barg; Christopher P Landrigan; Amanda Schondelmeyer; Patrick W Brady; Lisa M McLeod; Christopher P Bonafide Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2019-05-15
Authors: Steve Cunningham; Aryelly Rodriguez; Tim Adams; Kathleen A Boyd; Isabella Butcher; Beth Enderby; Morag MacLean; Jonathan McCormick; James Y Paton; Fiona Wee; Huw Thomas; Kay Riding; Steve W Turner; Chris Williams; Emma McIntosh; Steff C Lewis Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-09-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Irit R Rasooly; Spandana Makeneni; Amina N Khan; Brooke Luo; Naveen Muthu; Christopher P Bonafide Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2021-12 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Andrew S Kern-Goldberger; Irit R Rasooly; Brooke Luo; Sansanee Craig; Daria F Ferro; Halley Ruppel; Padmavathy Parthasarathy; Nathaniel Sergay; Courtney M Solomon; Kate E Lucey; Naveen Muthu; Christopher P Bonafide Journal: Hosp Pediatr Date: 2021-10
Authors: Christopher P Bonafide; Rui Xiao; Amanda C Schondelmeyer; Amy R Pettit; Patrick W Brady; Christopher P Landrigan; Courtney Benjamin Wolk; Zuleyha Cidav; Halley Ruppel; Naveen Muthu; Nathaniel J Williams; Enrique Schisterman; Canita R Brent; Kimberly Albanowski; Rinad S Beidas Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2022-10-21 Impact factor: 7.960
Authors: Courtney Benjamin Wolk; Amanda C Schondelmeyer; Frances K Barg; Rinad Beidas; Amanda Bettencourt; Patrick W Brady; Canita Brent; Whitney Eriksen; Grace Kinkler; Christopher P Landrigan; Rebecca Neergaard; Christopher P Bonafide Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Janet E Squires; Danielle Cho-Young; Laura D Aloisio; Robert Bell; Stephen Bornstein; Susan E Brien; Simon Decary; Melissa Demery Varin; Mark Dobrow; Carole A Estabrooks; Ian D Graham; Megan Greenough; Doris Grinspun; Michael Hillmer; Tanya Horsley; Jiale Hu; Alan Katz; Christina Krause; John Lavis; Wendy Levinson; Adrian Levy; Michelina Mancuso; Steve Morgan; Letitia Nadalin-Penno; Andrew Neuner; Tamara Rader; Wilmer J Santos; Gary Teare; Joshua Tepper; Amanda Vandyk; Michael Wilson; Jeremy M Grimshaw Journal: CMAJ Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 16.859
Authors: Amanda C Schondelmeyer; Amanda P Bettencourt; Rui Xiao; Rinad S Beidas; Courtney Benjamin Wolk; Christopher P Landrigan; Patrick W Brady; Canita R Brent; Padmavathy Parthasarathy; Andrew S Kern-Goldberger; Nathaniel Sergay; Vivian Lee; Christopher J Russell; Julianne Prasto; Sarah Zaman; Kaitlyn McQuistion; Kate Lucey; Courtney Solomon; Mayra Garcia; Christopher P Bonafide Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-09-01