Literature DB >> 16491407

A cognitive intersensory interaction mechanism in human postural control.

A Blümle1, C Maurer, G Schweigart, T Mergner.   

Abstract

Human control of upright body posture involves inputs from several senses (visual, vestibular, proprioceptive, somatosensory) and their central interactions. We recently studied visual effects on posture control and their intersensory interactions and found evidence for the existence of an indirect and presumably cognitive mode of interaction, in addition to a direct interaction (we found, e.g., that a 'virtual reality' visual stimulus has a weaker postural effect than a 'real world' scene, because of its illusory character). Here we focus on the presumed cognitive interaction mechanism. We report experiments in healthy subjects and vestibular loss patients. We investigated to what extent a postural response to lateral platform tilt is modulated by tilt of a visual scene in an orthogonal rotational plane (anterior-posterior, a-p, direction). The a-p visual stimulus did not evoke a lateral postural response on its own. But it enhanced the response to the lateral platform tilt (i.e., it increased the evoked body excursion). The effect was related to the velocity of the visual stimulus, showed a threshold at 0.31 degrees /s, and increased monotonically with increasing velocity. These characteristics were similar in normals and patients, but body excursions were larger in patients. In conclusion, the orthogonal stimulus arrangement in our experiments allowed us to selectively assess a cognitive intersensory interaction that upon co-planar stimulation tends to be merged with direct interaction. The observed threshold corresponds to the conscious perceptual detection threshold of the visual motion, which is clearly higher than the visual postural response threshold. This finding is in line with our notion of a cognitive phenomenon. We postulate that the cognitive mechanism in normals interferes with a central visual-vestibular interaction mechanism. This appears to be similar in vestibular loss patients, but patients use less effective somatosensory instead of vestibular anti-gravity mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16491407     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0384-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  10 in total

1.  Visual object localisation in space. Interaction of retinal, eye position, vestibular and neck proprioceptive information.

Authors:  T Mergner; G Nasios; C Maurer; W Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Inverse relation between postural variability and difficulty of a concurrent short-term memory task.

Authors:  Michael A Riley; Aimee A Baker; Jennifer M Schmit
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2003-12-30       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Vestibular, visual, and somatosensory contributions to human control of upright stance.

Authors:  C Maurer; T Mergner; B Bolha; F Hlavacka
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Expectation and the vestibular control of balance.

Authors:  Michel Guerraz; Brian L Day
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Human postural responses to motion of real and virtual visual environments under different support base conditions.

Authors:  T Mergner; G Schweigart; C Maurer; A Blümle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visual contributions to human self-motion perception during horizontal body rotation.

Authors:  T Mergner; G Schweigart; M Müller; F Hlavacka; W Becker
Journal:  Arch Ital Biol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  A multisensory posture control model of human upright stance.

Authors:  T Mergner; C Maurer; R J Peterka
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  Cognitive influences in postural control of patients with unilateral vestibular loss.

Authors:  Mark S Redfern; Michael E Talkowski; J Richard Jennings; Joseph M Furman
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Influence of action and expectation on visual control of posture.

Authors:  M Guerraz; K V Thilo; A M Bronstein; M A Gresty
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-04
  10 in total
  15 in total

1.  Role of cerebellum in motion perception and vestibulo-ocular reflex-similarities and disparities.

Authors:  Aasef G Shaikh; Antonella Palla; Sarah Marti; Itsaso Olasagasti; Lance M Optican; David S Zee; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Influence of expectation on postural disturbance evoked by proprioceptive stimulation.

Authors:  Sébastien Caudron; Fréderic Boy; Nicolas Forestier; Michel Guerraz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Interaction of posture and conscious perception of gravitational vertical and surface horizontal.

Authors:  W Geoffrey Wright; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Symmetries of a generic utricular projection: neural connectivity and the distribution of utricular information.

Authors:  Thomas Chartrand; Gin McCollum; Douglas A Hanes; Richard D Boyle
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Control of vertical posture while elevating one foot to avoid a real or virtual obstacle.

Authors:  Hirofumi Ida; Sambit Mohapatra; Alexander Aruin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  [Do meniscus injuries affect postural stability?].

Authors:  H-G Palm; C Laufer; F von Lübken; G Achatz; B Friemert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Self versus environment motion in postural control.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Contribution of visual velocity and displacement cues to human balancing of support surface tilt.

Authors:  Lorenz Assländer; Georg Hettich; Albert Gollhofer; Thomas Mergner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Human stance control beyond steady state response and inverted pendulum simplification.

Authors:  G Schweigart; T Mergner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The role of vestibular cues in postural sway.

Authors:  Faisal Karmali; Adam D Goodworth; Yulia Valko; Tania Leeder; Robert J Peterka; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.