Literature DB >> 17562029

Interaction of posture and conscious perception of gravitational vertical and surface horizontal.

W Geoffrey Wright1, Fay B Horak.   

Abstract

The extent to which postural orientation and perception of orientation share common central processes is unknown. If central resources are shared, automatic postural orientation in space and conscious perception of gravitational vertical (GV) or surface horizontal (SH) orientation should vary similarly with changing frequencies of surface tilts. Furthermore, shared central processing may result in altered postural orientation depending on the focus of conscious perception. Blindfolded, healthy subjects indicated perception of gravitational vertical and surface horizontal while standing on a tilting surface or sitting in an earth-fixed chair with only the feet on the tilting surface. Subjects oriented a hand-held rod to GV or perpendicular to the tilting support surface to indicate SH during anterior-posterior (A/P) sinusoidal surface tilt oscillation (+/-5 degrees /0.025-0.4 Hz). The gain and phase relationships of rod and postural tilt with respect to surface tilt were analyzed in all conditions. Average rod-tilt during the GV task was below 1.5 degrees and decreased with increasing frequency of surface oscillation, similar to the decrease in trunk tilt. Average rod-tilt when indicating SH was three to four times that of actual surface tilt during both sitting and standing postures and did not change across frequencies, unlike trunk tilt. Measures of postural stability were less variable during the GV than the SH task. This increased postural stability during the GV task and similar gain/phase patterns of postural and GV perceptual orientation across frequencies is consistent with shared central processing of automatic postural and conscious perception of orientation to gravity. In contrast, different gain/phase patterns of posture and conscious perception of SH orientation are consistent with separate processing of postural responses of changing surface orientation and perception of it. Conscious perception of sensory inputs related to verticality share central processing with postural control, which when accessed can have a stabilizing effect, whereas consciously perceiving a moving support surface can be destabilizing.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17562029     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0990-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  37 in total

1.  Contribution of ankle, knee, and hip joints to the perception threshold for support surface rotation.

Authors:  N Teasdale; V Nougier; P A Barraud; C Bourdin; B Debû; D Poquin; C Raphel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-05

2.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Interaction of vestibular, somatosensory and visual signals for postural control and motion perception under terrestrial and microgravity conditions--a conceptual model.

Authors:  T Mergner; T Rosemeier
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1998-11

Review 4.  Postural control in weightlessness: a dual process underlying adaptation to an unusual environment.

Authors:  F G Lestienne; V S Gurfinkel
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Standing man, slow rhythmic tilting, importance of vision.

Authors:  E G Walsh
Journal:  Agressologie       Date:  1973-09

6.  Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; L Zupan; R J Peterka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Adaptation of postural control to weightlessness.

Authors:  G Clément; V S Gurfinkel; F Lestienne; M I Lipshits; K E Popov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Smoothing and differentiation of displacement-time data: an application of splines and digital filtering.

Authors:  C L Vaughan
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1982-09

9.  Neck, trunk and limb muscle responses during postural perturbations in humans.

Authors:  E A Keshner; M H Woollacott; B Debu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Dynamic regulation of sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  Robert J Peterka; Patrick J Loughlin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  5 in total

1.  Foot anatomy specialization for postural sensation and control.

Authors:  W G Wright; Y P Ivanenko; V S Gurfinkel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Case Studies in Neuroscience: A dissociation of balance and posture demonstrated by camptocormia.

Authors:  R J St George; V S Gurfinkel; J Kraakevik; J G Nutt; F B Horak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Impaired perception of surface tilt in progressive supranuclear palsy.

Authors:  Marian L Dale; Fay B Horak; W Geoffrey Wright; Bernadette M Schoneburg; John G Nutt; Martina Mancini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Tonic Neuromuscular Processing Affects Postural Adaptation Differently in Aging and Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  W Geoffrey Wright
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 5.  Perception of Upright: Multisensory Convergence and the Role of Temporo-Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Amir Kheradmand; Ariel Winnick
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.