Literature DB >> 23686151

Contribution of visual velocity and displacement cues to human balancing of support surface tilt.

Lorenz Assländer1, Georg Hettich, Albert Gollhofer, Thomas Mergner.   

Abstract

Vision helps humans in controlling bipedal stance, interacting mainly with vestibular and proprioceptive cues. This study investigates how postural compensation of support surface tilt is compromised by selectively reducing visual velocity cues by stroboscopic illumination of a stationary visual scene. Healthy adult subjects were presented with pseudorandom tilt sequences in the sagittal plane (tilt frequency range 0.017-2.2 Hz; velocity amplitude spectrum constant up to a frequency of 0.6 Hz, angular displacement amplitude spectrum increasing with decreasing frequencies). Center of mass (COM) sway responses were recorded for stroboscopic illuminations at 48, 32, 16, 8, and 4 Hz, as well as under continuous illumination and with eyes closed. With strobe duration (5 ms) and mean luminance (1 lx) kept constant, visual acuity and perceived brightness remained constant and the visual scene was perceived as stationary. Yet, tilt-evoked COM excursions increased with decreasing strobe frequency in a graded way, with largest effects occurring at tilt frequencies where large tilt velocities coincided with small displacements. In addition, COM excursions were reduced at the lowest strobe frequency compared to eyes closed, with the largest effect occurring at tilt frequencies where tilt displacements were large. We conclude that two mechanisms exist, a velocity mechanism that deals with tilt compensation and is foremost affected by the stroboscopic illumination and a displacement mechanism. This compares favorably to previous findings that, transferred to a stance control model, suggest a velocity mechanism for tilt compensation and a position mechanism for gravity compensation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23686151     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3561-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Controlling human upright posture: velocity information is more accurate than position or acceleration.

Authors:  John Jeka; Tim Kiemel; Robert Creath; Fay Horak; Robert Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Vestibular, visual, and somatosensory contributions to human control of upright stance.

Authors:  C Maurer; T Mergner; B Bolha; F Hlavacka
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Failure of visual estimation of motion under strobe.

Authors:  T A Croft
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-06-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Visual contribution to rapid motor responses during postural control.

Authors:  L Nashner; A Berthoz
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Visual stabilization of posture. Physiological stimulus characteristics and clinical aspects.

Authors:  W M Paulus; A Straube; T Brandt
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  A multisensory posture control model of human upright stance.

Authors:  T Mergner; C Maurer; R J Peterka
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.453

8.  Role of somatosensory and vestibular cues in attenuating visually induced human postural sway.

Authors:  R J Peterka; M S Benolken
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Optokinetic and vection responses to apparent motion in man.

Authors:  C M Schor; V Lakshminarayanan; V Narayan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Postural reactions of dogs to sinusoidal motion in the peripheral visual field.

Authors:  R E Talbott
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1980-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  Visual contribution to human standing balance during support surface tilts.

Authors:  Lorenz Assländer; Georg Hettich; Thomas Mergner
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  Cineradiographic analysis of mouse postural response to alteration of gravity and jerk (gravity deceleration rate).

Authors:  Katsuya Hasegawa; Priscila S de Campos; Jorge L Zeredo; Yasuhiro Kumei
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2014-04-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.