Literature DB >> 31432249

Interaction of 4-ethylphenol, pH, sucrose and ethanol on the growth and fermentation capacity of the industrial strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae PE-2.

Elizabete A Covre1, Lincon F L Silva1, Reinaldo G Bastos1, Sandra R Ceccato-Antonini2.   

Abstract

Volatile phenols such as 4-ethylphenol are produced from hydroxycinnamic acids by Dekkera bruxellensis, an important yeast contaminating alcoholic fermentations. 4-ethylphenol results from the decarboxylation and reduction of p-coumaric acid, a compound found in sugarcane musts. In wine, volatile phenols are responsible by sensorial alterations whereas in the context of bioethanol fermentation, little is known about their effects on the main yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here we evaluated the interaction of 4-ethylphenol and pH, sucrose and ethanol on the growth and fermentation capacity of the industrial strain of S. cerevisiae PE-2. A central compound rotational design was utilized to evaluate the effect of 4-ethylphenol, pH, ethanol and sucrose concentration on the yeast maximum specific growth rate (µmax) in microplate experiments in YPS medium (Yeast extract-Peptone-Sucrose), at 30 °C. Following, single-cycle fermentations in YPS medium, pH 4.5, 17% sucrose, at 30 °C, with 4-ethylphenol in concentrations of 10 and 20 mg L-1 being added at the start or after 4 h of fermentation, were carried out. 4-ethylphenol affected µmax of S. cerevisiae in situations that resemble the conditions of industrial bioethanol production, especially the low pH of the fermentation medium and the high ethanol concentration because of the anaerobic sucrose uptake. The addition of 4-ethylphenol on fermentation resulted in significant effect on the cell yeast concentration, pH and alcohol production, with significant decrease from 86% to the range of 65-74% in the fermentative efficiency. The industrial yeast S. cerevisiae PE-2 growth and fermentative capacity were affected by the presence of 4-ethylphenol, a metabolite produced by D. bruxellensis, which may contribute to explain the impact of this yeast on bioethanol industrial production.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethanol; Dekkera; Growth; Saccharomyces; Volatile phenol

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31432249     DOI: 10.1007/s11274-019-2714-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0959-3993            Impact factor:   3.312


  35 in total

Review 1.  Novel insights into the osmotic stress response of yeast.

Authors:  Willem H Mager; Marco Siderius
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  Identification of Dekkera bruxellensis as a major contaminant yeast in continuous fuel ethanol fermentation.

Authors:  A T de Souza Liberal; A C M Basílio; A do Monte Resende; B T V Brasileiro; E A da Silva-Filho; J O F de Morais; D A Simões; M A de Morais
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.772

3.  Relationship between pH and medium dissolved solids in terms of growth and metabolism of lactobacilli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae during ethanol production.

Authors:  Neelakantam V Narendranath; Ronan Power
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Influence of magnesium ions on heat shock and ethanol stress responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors: 
Journal:  Enzyme Microb Technol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.493

5.  Effect of ethanol on cell growth of budding yeast: genes that are important for cell growth in the presence of ethanol.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kubota; Ikuko Takeo; Kazunori Kume; Muneyoshi Kanai; Atsunori Shitamukai; Masaki Mizunuma; Tokichi Miyakawa; Hitoshi Shimoi; Haruyuki Iefuji; Dai Hirata
Journal:  Biosci Biotechnol Biochem       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.043

6.  Molecular detection and identification of Brettanomyces/Dekkera bruxellensis and Brettanomyces/Dekkera anomalus in spoiled wines.

Authors:  Luca Cocolin; Kalliopi Rantsiou; Lucilla Iacumin; Roberto Zironi; Giuseppe Comi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Effect of pH and lactic or acetic acid on ethanol productivity by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash.

Authors:  Tara Graves; Neelakantam V Narendranath; Karl Dawson; Ronan Power
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 8.  Ethanol fermentation technologies from sugar and starch feedstocks.

Authors:  F W Bai; W A Anderson; M Moo-Young
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2007-09-08       Impact factor: 14.227

9.  Detection and identification of wild yeast contaminants of the industrial fuel ethanol fermentation process.

Authors:  A C M Basílio; P R L de Araújo; J O F de Morais; E A da Silva Filho; M A de Morais; D A Simões
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 10.  Biotechnological implications of filamentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Sandra Regina Ceccato-Antonini
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 2.461

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.