Literature DB >> 16491309

Prospective study of electrical impedance scanning for identifying young women at risk for breast cancer.

Alexander Stojadinovic1, Orah Moskovitz, Zahava Gallimidi, Scott Fields, Ari D Brooks, Rachel Brem, Robert N Mucciola, Mukul Singh, Mary Maniscalco-Theberge, Howard E Rockette, David Gur, Craig D Shriver.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One way to improve the cost-benefit ratio for breast cancer screening in younger women is to identify those at high-risk of breast cancer and manage them in an optimal manner. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of Electrical Impedance Scanning (EIS) for identifying young women who are at risk for having breast cancer and should be followed with directed imaging technologies.
METHODS: A prospective, observational, two-arm, multi-site clinical trial was performed on women aged 30-45 years. The 'Sensitivity Arm' included Clinical Breast Examinations (CBE) and EIS (T-Scan 2000ED) on 189 women prior to scheduled breast biopsy. The 'Specificity Arm' included 1361 asymptomatic women visiting clinics for routine annual well-woman examination. Sensitivity and specificity were determined. Relative probability for a woman with a positive EIS examination was computed and compared with other approaches commonly used to define 'high-risk' in this population.
RESULTS: Fifty of 189 women in the Sensitivity arm had verified cancers, 19 of whom had positive EIS examination resulting in sensitivity of 38% (19/50). Of the 1361 women in the Specificity arm, 67 had positive EIS examination resulting in a specificity of 95% (1294/1361). The relative probability of a woman with a positive EIS examination was 7.68, which compares favorably with other established risk identifiers (e.g. two first-degree relatives with breast cancer or atypical ductal hyperplasia).
CONCLUSION: EIS may have an important role as a screening tool for identifying young women that should be followed more closely with advanced imaging technologies for early detection of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16491309     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-005-9109-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  12 in total

1.  The Future of Breast Cancer Diagnostics.

Authors:  Felix Diekmann; Susanne Diekmann
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  [Mammography screening in Germany].

Authors:  S Diekmann; F Diekmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  A preliminary evaluation of multi-probe resonance-frequency electrical impedance based measurements of the breast.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Dror Lederman; Jules H Sumkin; Margarita L Zuley; Michelle Z Gruss; Linda S Lovy; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  The use of skin surface electropotentials for breast cancer detection--preliminary clinical trial results obtained using the biofield diagnostic system.

Authors:  Subbhuraam Vinitha Sree; E Y K Ng; G Kaw; Rajendra Acharya U; B K Chong
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  A GMM-based breast cancer risk stratification using a resonance-frequency electrical impedance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Dror Lederman; Bin Zheng; Xingwei Wang; Jules H Sumkin; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Detection of breast abnormalities using a prototype resonance electrical impedance spectroscopy system: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Margarita L Zuley; Jules H Sumkin; Victor J Catullo; Gordon S Abrams; Grace Y Rathfon; Denise M Chough; Michelle Z Gruss; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Real-time electrical impedance variations in women with and without breast cancer.

Authors:  Ryan J Halter; Alex Hartov; Steven P Poplack; Roberta diFlorio-Alexander; Wendy A Wells; Kari M Rosenkranz; Richard J Barth; Peter A Kaufman; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 8.  Future directions for the early detection of recurrent breast cancer.

Authors:  Erika J Schneble; Lindsey J Graham; Matthew P Shupe; Frederick L Flynt; Kevin P Banks; Aaron D Kirkpatrick; Aviram Nissan; Leonard Henry; Alexander Stojadinovic; Nathan M Shumway; Itzhak Avital; George E Peoples; Robert F Setlik
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Modern breast cancer detection: a technological review.

Authors:  Adam B Nover; Shami Jagtap; Waqas Anjum; Hakki Yegingil; Wan Y Shih; Wei-Heng Shih; Ari D Brooks
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2009-12-28

10.  Clinical decision modeling system.

Authors:  Haiwen Shi; James Lyons-Weiler
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.