Literature DB >> 21520878

A GMM-based breast cancer risk stratification using a resonance-frequency electrical impedance spectroscopy.

Dror Lederman1, Bin Zheng, Xingwei Wang, Jules H Sumkin, David Gur.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors developed and tested a multiprobe-based resonance-frequency-based electrical impedance spectroscopy (REIS) system. The purpose of this study was to preliminarily assess the performance of this system in classifying younger women into two groups, those ultimately recommended for biopsy during imaging-based diagnostic workups that followed screening and those rated as negative during mammography.
METHODS: A seven probe-based REIS system was designed, assembled, and is currently being tested in the breast imaging facility. During an examination, contact is made with the nipple and six concentric points on the breast skin. For each measurement channel between the center probe and one of the six external probes, a set of electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) signal sweeps is performed and signal outputs ranging from 200 to 800 kHz at 5 kHz interval are recorded. An initial subset of 174 examinations from an ongoing prospective clinical study was selected for this preliminary analysis. An initial set of 35 features, 33 of which represented the corresponding EIS signal differences between the left and right breasts, was established. A Gaussian mixture model (GMM) classifier was developed to differentiate between "positive" (biopsy recommended) cases and "negative" (nonbiopsy) cases. Selecting an optimal feature set was performed using genetic algorithms with an area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as the fitness criterion.
RESULTS: The recorded EIS signal sweeps showed that, in general, negative (nonbiopsy) examinations have a higher level of electrical impedance symmetry between the two breasts than positive (biopsy) examinations. Fourteen features were selected by genetic algorithm and used in the optimized GMM classifier. Using a leave-one-case-out test, the GMM classifier yielded a performance level of AUC = 0.78, which compared favorably to other three widely used classifiers including support vector machine, classification tree, and linear discriminant analysis. These results also suggest that the REIS signal based GMM classifier could be used as a prescreening tool to correctly identify a fraction of younger women at higher risk of developing breast cancer (i.e., 47% sensitivity at 90% specificity).
CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms that asymmetry in electrical impedance characteristics between two breasts provides valuable information regarding the presence of a developing breast abnormality; hence, REIS data may be useful in classifying younger women into two groups of "average" and "significantly higher than average" risk of having or developing a breast abnormality that would ultimately result in a later imaging-based recommendation for biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21520878      PMCID: PMC3064686          DOI: 10.1118/1.3555300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  28 in total

1.  Performance gain in computer-assisted detection schemes by averaging scores generated from artificial neural networks with adaptive filtering.

Authors:  B Zheng; Y H Chang; W F Good; D Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Efficient greedy learning of gaussian mixture models.

Authors:  J J Verbeek; N Vlassis; B Kröse
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  Novel EIS postprocessing algorithm for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Yaël A Glickman; Orna Filo; Udi Nachaliel; Sarah Lenington; Sigal Amin-Spector; Ron Ginor
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Electromagnetic breast imaging: average tissue property values in women with negative clinical findings.

Authors:  Steven P Poplack; Keith D Paulsen; Alexander Hartov; Paul M Meaney; Brian W Pogue; Tor D Tosteson; Margaret R Grove; Sandra K Soho; Wendy A Wells
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Dielectric properties of breast carcinoma and the surrounding tissues.

Authors:  A J Surowiec; S S Stuchly; J B Barr; A Swarup
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Electrical impedance scanning for classifying suspicious breast lesions: first results.

Authors:  A Malich; T Fritsch; R Anderson; T Boehm; M G Freesmeyer; M Fleck; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Breast cancer screening among women younger than age 50: a current assessment of the issues.

Authors:  R A Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Electrical impedance spectroscopy of the breast: clinical imaging results in 26 subjects.

Authors:  Todd E Kerner; Keith D Paulsen; Alex Hartov; Sandra K Soho; Steven P Poplack
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  Mieke Kriege; Cecile T M Brekelmans; Carla Boetes; Peter E Besnard; Harmine M Zonderland; Inge Marie Obdeijn; Radu A Manoliu; Theo Kok; Hans Peterse; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Sara H Muller; Sybren Meijer; Jan C Oosterwijk; Louk V A M Beex; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Harry J de Koning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Donald B Plewes; Kimberley A Hill; Petrina A Causer; Judit T Zubovits; Roberta A Jong; Margaret R Cutrara; Gerrit DeBoer; Martin J Yaffe; Sandra J Messner; Wendy S Meschino; Cameron A Piron; Steven A Narod
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Classification of thyroid nodules using a resonance-frequency-based electrical impedance spectroscopy: a preliminary assessment.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Mitchell E Tublin; Amy H Klym; David Gur
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 6.568

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.