Literature DB >> 18697526

Detection of breast abnormalities using a prototype resonance electrical impedance spectroscopy system: a preliminary study.

Bin Zheng1, Margarita L Zuley, Jules H Sumkin, Victor J Catullo, Gordon S Abrams, Grace Y Rathfon, Denise M Chough, Michelle Z Gruss, David Gur.   

Abstract

Electrical impedance spectroscopy has been investigated with but limited success as an adjunct procedure to mammography and as a possible pre-screening tool to stratify risk for having or developing breast cancer in younger women. In this study, the authors explored a new resonance frequency based [resonance electrical impedance spectroscopy (REIS)] approach to identify breasts that may have highly suspicious abnormalities that had been recommended for biopsies. The authors assembled a prototype REIS system generating multifrequency electrical sweeps ranging from 100 to 4100 kHz every 12 s. Using only two probes, one in contact with the nipple and the other with the outer breast skin surface 60 mm away, a paired transmission signal detection system is generated. The authors recruited 150 women between 30 and 50 years old to participate in this study. REIS measurements were performed on both breasts. Of these women 58 had been scheduled for a breast biopsy and 13 had been recalled for additional imaging procedures due to suspicious findings. The remaining 79 women had negative screening examinations. Eight REIS output signals at and around the resonance frequency were computed for each breast and the subtracted signals between the left and right breasts were used in a simple jackknifing method to select an optimal feature set to be inputted into a multi-feature based artificial neural network (ANN) that aims to predict whether a woman's breast had been determined as abnormal (warranting a biopsy) or not. The classification performance was evaluated using a leave-one-case-out method and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. The study shows that REIS examination is easy to perform, short in duration, and acceptable to all participants in terms of comfort level and there is no indication of sensation of an electrical current during the measurements. Six REIS difference features were selected as input signals to the ANN. The area under the ROC curve (A(z)) was 0.707 +/- 0.033 for classifying between biopsy cases and non-biopsy (including recalled and screening negative) and the performance (A(z)) increased to 0.746 +/- 0.033 after excluding recalled but negative cases. At 95% specificity, the sensitivity levels were approximately 20.5% and 30.4% in the two data sets tested. The results suggest that differences in REIS signals between two breasts measured in and around the tissue resonance frequency can be used to identify at least some of the women with suspicious abnormalities warranting biopsy with high specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18697526      PMCID: PMC2673557          DOI: 10.1118/1.2936221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  21 in total

1.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation.

Authors:  J M Boone; T R Nelson; K K Lindfors; J A Seibert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Novel EIS postprocessing algorithm for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Yaël A Glickman; Orna Filo; Udi Nachaliel; Sarah Lenington; Sigal Amin-Spector; Ron Ginor
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Electromagnetic breast imaging: average tissue property values in women with negative clinical findings.

Authors:  Steven P Poplack; Keith D Paulsen; Alexander Hartov; Paul M Meaney; Brian W Pogue; Tor D Tosteson; Margaret R Grove; Sandra K Soho; Wendy A Wells
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Carla Boetes; Wylie Burke; Steven Harms; Martin O Leach; Constance D Lehman; Elizabeth Morris; Etta Pisano; Mitchell Schnall; Stephen Sener; Robert A Smith; Ellen Warner; Martin Yaffe; Kimberly S Andrews; Christy A Russell
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Electrical impedance scanning for classifying suspicious breast lesions: first results.

Authors:  A Malich; T Fritsch; R Anderson; T Boehm; M G Freesmeyer; M Fleck; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Electrical impedance spectroscopy of the breast: clinical imaging results in 26 subjects.

Authors:  Todd E Kerner; Keith D Paulsen; Alex Hartov; Sandra K Soho; Steven P Poplack
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  Mieke Kriege; Cecile T M Brekelmans; Carla Boetes; Peter E Besnard; Harmine M Zonderland; Inge Marie Obdeijn; Radu A Manoliu; Theo Kok; Hans Peterse; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Sara H Muller; Sybren Meijer; Jan C Oosterwijk; Louk V A M Beex; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Harry J de Koning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Donald B Plewes; Kimberley A Hill; Petrina A Causer; Judit T Zubovits; Roberta A Jong; Margaret R Cutrara; Gerrit DeBoer; Martin J Yaffe; Sandra J Messner; Wendy S Meschino; Cameron A Piron; Steven A Narod
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2003.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Harmon J Eyre
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  John M Lewin; Carl J D'Orsi; R Edward Hendrick; Lawrence J Moss; Pamela K Isaacs; Andrew Karellas; Gary R Cutter
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  2 in total

1.  A preliminary evaluation of multi-probe resonance-frequency electrical impedance based measurements of the breast.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Dror Lederman; Jules H Sumkin; Margarita L Zuley; Michelle Z Gruss; Linda S Lovy; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  A GMM-based breast cancer risk stratification using a resonance-frequency electrical impedance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Dror Lederman; Bin Zheng; Xingwei Wang; Jules H Sumkin; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.