Literature DB >> 16489592

Preferential reaching across regions of hemispace in adults and children.

Pamela J Bryden1, E A Roy.   

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to examine hand selection during reaching in children utilizing a developmental version of the preferential reaching paradigm (Bryden, Pryde, & Roy, 2000). A cross-sectional sample of eighty right-handed participants (ranging in age from 3 to 20 years) were asked to reach to objects located in different regions of hemispace. Each participant was asked to carry out two different actions, varying in degree of complexity, on the objects while the experimenter observed, which hand was used to perform each of the tasks. A repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that reaching towards the midline and ipsilateral positions in hemispace resulted in significantly more preferred hand reaches than reaching towards contralateral hemispace, regardless of age and task. With respect to age group effects, it was found that the 6 and 7 year olds and the 9 and 10 year olds relied heavily on their preferred hand to perform the task, indicating that hand selection in these children was driven primarily by motor dominance. In comparison, the youngest children and adults used their nonpreferred hand more frequently in contralateral space, indicating that object proximity cues or a hemispheric bias was driving hand selection. The implications of these findings for understanding hand preference and skill were discussed in terms of motor dominance versus spatial reasoning theory of hand selection in unimanual reaching. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psyshobiol 48: 121-132, 2006.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16489592     DOI: 10.1002/dev.20120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychobiol        ISSN: 0012-1630            Impact factor:   3.038


  26 in total

1.  Action properties of object images facilitate visual search.

Authors:  Michael A Gomez; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  A dissociation between visual and motor workspace inhibits generalization of visuomotor adaptation across the limbs.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Hemispheric differences in the control of limb dynamics: a link between arm performance asymmetries and arm selection patterns.

Authors:  Chase J Coelho; Andrzej Przybyla; Vivek Yadav; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Is Hand Selection Modulated by Cognitive-perceptual Load?

Authors:  Jiali Liang; Krista Wilkinson; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Sex-based differences in neurocognitive functioning in HIV-infected young adults.

Authors:  Ruxandra Burlacu; Anya Umlauf; Anca Luca; Sara Gianella; Roxana Radoi; Simona M Ruta; Thomas D Marcotte; Luminita Ene; Cristian L Achim
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2018-01-14       Impact factor: 4.177

6.  Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: evidence for different roles?

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Devon C Bryant; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Is handedness just response bias?

Authors:  Chase J Coelho; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

8.  Grasping with the eyes of your hands: hapsis and vision modulate hand preference.

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Sensorimotor performance asymmetries predict hand selection.

Authors:  A Przybyla; C J Coelho; S Akpinar; S Kirazci; R L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  From the reaching behavior at 5 months of age to hand preference at preschool age.

Authors:  Peter B Marschik; Christa Einspieler; Andrea Strohmeier; Johann Plienegger; Bettina Garzarolli; Heinz F R Prechtl
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.