Literature DB >> 29129794

Is Hand Selection Modulated by Cognitive-perceptual Load?

Jiali Liang1, Krista Wilkinson2, Robert L Sainburg3.   

Abstract

Previous studies proposed that selecting which hand to use for a reaching task appears to be modulated by a factor described as "task difficulty". However, what features of a task might contribute to greater or lesser "difficulty" in the context of hand selection decisions has yet to be determined. There has been evidence that biomechanical and kinematic factors such as movement smoothness and work can predict patterns of selection across the workspace, suggesting a role of predictive cost analysis in hand-selection. We hypothesize that this type of prediction for hand-selection should recruit substantial cognitive resources and thus should be influenced by cognitive-perceptual loading. We test this hypothesis by assessing the role of cognitive-perceptual loading on hand selection decisions, using a visual search task that presents different levels of difficulty (cognitive-perceptual load), as established in previous studies on overall response time and efficiency of visual search. Although the data are necessarily preliminary due to small sample size, our data suggested an influence of cognitive-perceptual load on hand selection, such that the dominant hand was selected more frequently as cognitive load increased. Interestingly, cognitive-perceptual loading also increased cross-midline reaches with both hands. Because crossing midline is more costly in terms of kinematic and kinetic factors, our findings suggest that cognitive processes are normally engaged to avoid costly actions, and that the choice not-to-cross midline requires cognitive resources.
Copyright © 2017 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive–perceptual load; hand selection; reaching; task difficulty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29129794      PMCID: PMC7235685          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  43 in total

Review 1.  What determines choice of limb for unimanual reaching movements?

Authors:  C Gabbard; C Rabb
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2000-04

Review 2.  Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research.

Authors:  Marjorie Woollacott; Anne Shumway-Cook
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Cultural influences on the development of lateral preferences: a comparison between French and Tunisian children.

Authors:  Jacqueline Fagard; Riadh Dahmen
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2004-01

4.  Which factors affect hand selection in children's grasping in hemispace? Combined effects of task demand and motor dominance.

Authors:  Pascale Leconte; Jacqueline Fagard
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  The relation between hand preference and hand performance: what you get depends on what you measure.

Authors:  R E Steenhuis
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  1999-01

6.  Quantifying hand preference using a behavioural continuum.

Authors:  G A Calvert; D V Bishop
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  1998-07

Review 7.  Age-related differences in attentional cost associated with postural dual tasks: increased recruitment of generic cognitive resources in older adults.

Authors:  Matthieu P Boisgontier; Iseult A M Beets; Jacques Duysens; Alice Nieuwboer; Ralf T Krampe; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Eye-tracking measures reveal how changes in the design of aided AAC displays influence the efficiency of locating symbols by school-age children without disabilities.

Authors:  Krista M Wilkinson; Tara O'Neill; William J McIlvane
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Measuring handedness with questionnaires.

Authors:  M P Bryden
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement.

Authors:  M J Hollerbach; T Flash
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.