Literature DB >> 28263627

Action properties of object images facilitate visual search.

Michael A Gomez1, Jacqueline C Snow1.   

Abstract

There is mounting evidence that constraints from action can influence the early stages of object selection, even in the absence of any explicit preparation for action. Here, we examined whether action properties of images can influence visual search, and whether such effects were modulated by hand preference. Observers searched for an oddball target among 3 distractors. The search arrays consisted either of images of graspable "handles" ("action-related" stimuli), or images that were otherwise identical to the handles but in which the semicircular fulcrum element was reoriented so that the stimuli no longer looked like graspable objects ("non-action-related" stimuli). In Experiment 1, right-handed observers, who have been shown previously to prefer to use the right hand over the left for manual tasks, were faster to detect targets in action-related versus non-action-related arrays, and showed a response time (reaction time [RT]) advantage for rightward- versus leftward-oriented action-related handles. In Experiment 2, left-handed observers, who have been shown to use the left and right hands relatively equally in manual tasks, were also faster to detect targets in the action-related versus non-action-related arrays, but RTs were equally fast for rightward- and leftward-oriented handle targets. Together, or results suggest that action properties in images, and constraints for action imposed by preferences for manual interaction with objects, can influence attentional selection in the context of visual search. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28263627      PMCID: PMC5459661          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  57 in total

1.  Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection.

Authors:  M Jane Riddoch; Glyn W Humphreys; Sarah Edwards; Tracy Baker; Katherine Willson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Perception and action.

Authors:  Sarah H Creem-Regehr; Benjamin R Kunz
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-11

3.  Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special?

Authors:  Sarah H Creem-Regehr; James N Lee
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-24

4.  Action relations, semantic relations, and familiarity of spatial position in Balint's syndrome: crossover effects on perceptual report and on localization.

Authors:  Glyn W Humphreys; M Jane Riddoch; Helen Fortt
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Left handedness does not extend to visually guided precision grasping.

Authors:  Claudia L R Gonzalez; R L Whitwell; B Morrissey; T Ganel; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effects of action relations on the configural coding between objects.

Authors:  M J Riddoch; B Pippard; L Booth; J Rickell; J Summers; A Brownson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The effects of handedness and reachability on perceived distance.

Authors:  Sally A Linkenauger; Jessica K Witt; Jeanine K Stefanucci; Jonathan Z Bakdash; Dennis R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Left hand, but not right hand, reaching is sensitive to visual context.

Authors:  Jos J Adam; Rick Müskens; Susan Hoonhorst; Jay Pratt; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Is that within reach? fMRI reveals that the human superior parieto-occipital cortex encodes objects reachable by the hand.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi; Jody C Culham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: repetition effects for pictures versus real objects.

Authors:  Jacqueline C Snow; Charles E Pettypiece; Teresa D McAdam; Adam D McLean; Patrick W Stroman; Melvyn A Goodale; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  6 in total

1.  Where the action could be: Speakers look at graspable objects and meaningful scene regions when describing potential actions.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Rehrig; Candace E Peacock; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions.

Authors:  Carissa A Romero; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Look at what I can do: Object affordances guide visual attention while speakers describe potential actions.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Rehrig; Madison Barker; Candace E Peacock; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.157

Review 4.  Towards a unified perspective of object shape and motion processing in human dorsal cortex.

Authors:  Gennady Erlikhman; Gideon P Caplovitz; Gennadiy Gurariy; Jared Medina; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2018-05-18

5.  Spatial coding for memory-guided reaching in visual and pictorial spaces.

Authors:  Harun Karimpur; Siavash Eftekharifar; Nikolaus F Troje; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Virtually the same? How impaired sensory information in virtual reality may disrupt vision for action.

Authors:  David J Harris; Gavin Buckingham; Mark R Wilson; Samuel J Vine
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.