Literature DB >> 23456411

Is handedness just response bias?

Chase J Coelho1, David A Rosenbaum.   

Abstract

Although most people prefer to use the right hand for unimanual tasks, it is unknown whether handedness arises from response bias. Whether it does is a question inspired by signal detection theory. We drew on the framework of signal detection theory to assess bias and sensitivity in hand choice by asking right-handers to choose between two tasks-one performed with the left hand, and one performed with the right. For some participants, the left-hand task stayed constant while the right-hand task was varied. For other participants, the right-hand stayed constant while the left-hand task was varied. We reasoned that if hand preference only reflected bias, participants would choose the generally preferred hand to the same degree, regardless of whether its task was constant or varied. Our participants followed this strategy only to some extent, suggesting that bias and sensitivity both contribute to hand preference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23456411     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0415-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  22 in total

1.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Hemispheric asymmetries in attentional control: implications for hand preference in sensorimotor tasks.

Authors:  M Verfaellie; K M Heilman
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 3.  Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization.

Authors:  Giorgio Vallortigara; Lesley J Rogers
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  Reaching patterns across working space: the effects of handedness, task demands, and comfort levels.

Authors:  Carla M Mamolo; Eric A Roy; Linda E Rohr; Pamela J Bryden
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2006-09

5.  Saccade target selection in the superior colliculus: a signal detection theory approach.

Authors:  Byounghoon Kim; Michele A Basso
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The development of hand preference in children: the effect of task demands and links with manual dexterity.

Authors:  Elisabeth L Hill; Fateha Khanem
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Moving the arm at different rates: slow movements are avoided.

Authors:  Robrecht P R D van der Wel; Dagmar Sternad; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.328

9.  Preferential reaching across regions of hemispace in adults and children.

Authors:  Pamela J Bryden; E A Roy
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.038

10.  Handedness in childhood autism shows a dissociation of skill and preference.

Authors:  I C McManus; B Murray; K Doyle; S Baron-Cohen
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  1 in total

1.  Bimanual comfort depends on how extreme either hand's posture is, not on which hand is in the more extreme posture.

Authors:  Kate M Chapman; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.