Literature DB >> 16489195

Techniques for measurement of dose width product in panoramic dental radiography.

P Doyle1, C J Martin, J Robertson.   

Abstract

Dose width product (DWP) is the quantity recommended for assessment of patient dose for panoramic dental radiography. It is the product of the absorbed dose in air in the X-ray beam integrated over an exposure cycle and the width of the beam, both measured at the receiving slit. A robust method for measuring the DWP is required in order to facilitate optimization of practices and enable comparison of dose levels at different centres. In this study, three techniques for measuring the DWP have been evaluated through comparison of results from 20 orthopantomographic units. These used a small in-beam semiconductor detector and X-ray film, a pencil ionization chamber and an array of thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs). The mean results obtained with the three techniques agreed within +/-6%. The technique employing a pencil ionization chamber of the type used for dose assessment of CT scanners is the simplest and most reliable method. The in-beam detector and film method has larger errors both from positioning the radiation detector and from measurement of X-ray beam width, which should be the full width at half maximum obtained from a scan of the film optical density. The TLD array method was accurate, but more time consuming to carry out. The mean DWP for the units studied was 65 mGy mm and the mean dose-area product was 89 mGy cm2. The DWP for 30% of the units tested exceeded the diagnostic reference dose of 65 mGy mm, recommended by the National Radiological Protection Board.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16489195     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/33207232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  4 in total

1.  Comparative study of jaws with multislice computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  G Carrafiello; M Dizonno; V Colli; S Strocchi; S Pozzi Taubert; A Leonardi; A Giorgianni; M Barresi; A Macchi; E Bracchi; L Conte; C Fugazzola
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Optimisation in general radiography.

Authors:  Cj Martin
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-04-01

3.  Assessment of Adult Diagnostic Reference Levels for Panoramic Radiography in Tamil Nadu Region.

Authors:  Amal Jose; A Saravana Kumar; K N Govindarajan; B Devanand; N Elango
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-11

4.  Assessment of Regional Pediatric Diagnostic Reference Levels for Panoramic Radiography Using Dose Area Product.

Authors:  Amal Jose; A Saravana Kumar; K N Govindarajan; P Manimaran
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.