OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy in vitro and in vivo of a new antibacterial suture (PGAB) compared with a traditional braided suture (PG). Our primary goals were to study microbiological effectiveness and impact on wound healing of PGAB vs PG. Secondary goal was to analyze influence on inflammatory response. METHODS: In vitro study: clinical samples of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, S. hominis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus auricularis, Enterococcus faecalis, Corynebacterium spp. and Escherichia coli were studied. We also implanted a flat mesh in 10 minipigs, four incisions each (two PG and two PGAB) two contaminated with S. epidermidis and two not contaminated. Finally, we performed four colic anastomosis in each of 10 minipigs, two contaminated with E. coli and two not contaminated (two PG and two PGAB). We studied the inflammatory and wound healing processes in both models. RESULTS: We observed a bactericidal efficacy of PGAB against grampositive, and bacteriostatic effect against E. coli. Mesh study: recovered CFU were lower in the group PGAB vs PG. In the group PGAB, inflammatory mediators' concentrations were lower. In the group PGAB, concentrations of wound healing mediators were normal. Colic anastomosis: recovered CFU were lower in the group PGAB vs the group PG. In the group PGAB we observed a reduction of inflammatory mediators. In the group PGAB we observed normalized concentrations of wound healing mediators. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates microbiological efficacy of PGAB, that normalizes wound healing process, and an anti-inflammatory effect.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy in vitro and in vivo of a new antibacterial suture (PGAB) compared with a traditional braided suture (PG). Our primary goals were to study microbiological effectiveness and impact on wound healing of PGAB vs PG. Secondary goal was to analyze influence on inflammatory response. METHODS: In vitro study: clinical samples of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, S. hominis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus auricularis, Enterococcus faecalis, Corynebacterium spp. and Escherichia coli were studied. We also implanted a flat mesh in 10 minipigs, four incisions each (two PG and two PGAB) two contaminated with S. epidermidis and two not contaminated. Finally, we performed four colic anastomosis in each of 10 minipigs, two contaminated with E. coli and two not contaminated (two PG and two PGAB). We studied the inflammatory and wound healing processes in both models. RESULTS: We observed a bactericidal efficacy of PGAB against grampositive, and bacteriostatic effect against E. coli. Mesh study: recovered CFU were lower in the group PGAB vs PG. In the group PGAB, inflammatory mediators' concentrations were lower. In the group PGAB, concentrations of wound healing mediators were normal. Colic anastomosis: recovered CFU were lower in the group PGAB vs the group PG. In the group PGAB we observed a reduction of inflammatory mediators. In the group PGAB we observed normalized concentrations of wound healing mediators. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates microbiological efficacy of PGAB, that normalizes wound healing process, and an anti-inflammatory effect.
Authors: Shixuan Chen; Liangpeng Ge; Aubrey Mueller; Mark A Carlson; Matthew J Teusink; Franklin D Shuler; Jingwei Xie Journal: Nanomedicine Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 5.307
Authors: Shixuan Chen; Liangpeng Ge; Adrian F Gombart; Franklin D Shuler; Mark A Carlson; Debra A Reilly; Jingwei Xie Journal: Nanomedicine (Lond) Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 5.307
Authors: Christoph Justinger; Jochen Schuld; Jens Sperling; Otto Kollmar; Sven Richter; Martin Karl Schilling Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Kuk Hyun Jung; Seung Jong Oh; Kang Kook Choi; Su Mi Kim; Min Gew Choi; Jun Ho Lee; Jae Hyung Noh; Tae Sung Sohn; Jae Moon Bae; Sung Kim Journal: Ann Surg Treat Res Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 1.859
Authors: Jean-Claude Harnet; Erell Le Guen; Vincent Ball; Henri Tenenbaum; Joelle Ogier; Youssef Haikel; Constant Vodouhê Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2008-08-16 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: Jeffrey A Blatnik; Thimma R Thatiparti; David M Krpata; Sean T Zuckerman; Michael J Rosen; Horst A von Recum Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 2.192