Literature DB >> 28721567

Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.

Yong Yuan1, Xiao-Xi Zeng2, Yong-Fan Zhao1, Long-Qi Chen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage and stricture contribute to a large number of mortality and morbidity after esophagectomy. The aim of this work is to evaluate the outcome of modified double-layer hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis during minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
METHODS: The clinicopathological data of 176 consecutive esophageal cancer patients who underwent cervical esophagogastric anastomosis using modified double-layer hand-sewn technique after radical esophagectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Total minimally invasive approach, including thoracoscopic surgery for thoracic procedure and laparoscopic approach for abdominal procedure, was implemented during the radical Mckeown esophagectomy. Patients were followed up for the assessment of postoperative anastomotic complications including anastomotic leakage and stricture, being the primary outcome measures for this study.
RESULTS: Anastomotic leakage occurred in 2 of 176 patients (1.1%); both of the patients experienced only minor leakage and were treated conservatively. There was no significant difference in leakage between patients with and without major comorbidity (p = 0.331). After a mean follow-up of 21.3 months, four patients (4/176, 2.3%) developed benign anastomotic strictures, including those 2 patients experienced postoperative leakage. Symptoms for stricture were improved by endoscopic dilatations in all 4 patients. Besides, there was one case (1/176, 0.6%) of gastric necrosis in this cohort, who was also successfully managed by conservative therapy with no operative mortality.
CONCLUSION: This modified double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis is a highly safe and stable technique for esophagogastrostomy, which is an effective way to prevent both anastomotic leakage and stricture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28721567     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4126-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  22 in total

Review 1.  Transthoracic Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy: Current Trends.

Authors:  Carrie E Ryan; Alessandro Paniccia; Robert A Meguid; Martin D McCarter
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Incidence and Risk Factors for Anastomotic Stricture after Esophagectomy with Gastric Tube Reconstruction.

Authors:  Takaaki Hanyu; Shin-Ichi Kosugi; Takashi Ishikawa; Hiroshi Ichikawa; Toshifumi Wakai
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2015-06

Review 3.  Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy.

Authors:  T Lerut; W Coosemans; G Decker; P De Leyn; P Nafteux; D van Raemdonck
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.588

Review 4.  Esophageal anastomosis.

Authors:  Y Yuan; K-N Wang; L-Q Chen
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 5.  Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michitaka Honda; Akira Kuriyama; Hisashi Noma; Souya Nunobe; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Clinical application of layered anastomosis during esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  Zi-Jiang Zhu; Yong-Fan Zhao; Long-Qi Chen; Yang Hu; Lun-Xu Liu; Yun Wang; Ying-Li Kou
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Single-layered cervical esophageal anastomoses: a prospective study of two suturing techniques.

Authors:  R Bardini; L Bonavina; M Asolati; A Ruol; C Castoro; E Tiso
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.

Authors:  Shanda H Blackmon; Arlene M Correa; Bob Wynn; Wayne L Hofstetter; Linda W Martin; Reza J Mehran; David C Rice; Steven G Swisher; Garrett L Walsh; Jack A Roth; Ara A Vaporciyan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Quality of Life and Late Complications After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  K W Maas; M A Cuesta; M I van Berge Henegouwen; J Roig; L Bonavina; C Rosman; S S Gisbertz; S S A Y Biere; D L van der Peet; J H Klinkenbijl; M W Hollmann; E S de Lange; H J Bonjer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Waresijiang Yibulayin; Sikandaer Abulizi; Hongbo Lv; Wei Sun
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of a modified one-piece mechanical and double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis in McKeown esophagogastrectomy: A single-institute retrospective study.

Authors:  Kunshou Zhu; Jiulong Zhang; Xiaohui Chen; Yujie Deng; Shaofeng Lin; Yibin Cai; Guibin Weng
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-05-12

2.  Pre-embedded cervical circular stapled anastomosis in esophagectomy.

Authors:  Jie Li; Bin Wang; Tao Liang; Nan-Nan Guo; Ming Zhao
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 3.  Risk factors and therapeutic measures for postoperative complications associated with esophagectomy.

Authors:  Mojtaba Ahmadinejad; Ali Soltanian; Leila Haji Maghsoudi
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-05-23

4.  Risk factors for benign anastomotic stricture post-oesophagectomy: single-centre analysis of 702 oesophagectomies with squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yi-Min Gu; Yu-Shang Yang; Qi-Xin Shang; Wen-Ping Wang; Yong Yuan; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.241

5.  Management of refractory cervical anastomotic fistula after esophagectomy using the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap.

Authors:  Lifei Deng; Yan Li; Weixiong Li; Muyuan Liu; Shaowei Xu; Hanwei Peng
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.