Literature DB >> 16485747

Suppressing the surface field during transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Kent R Davey1, Mark Riehl.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used commonly as both a diagnostic tool and as an alternative to electric shock therapy for the treatment of clinical depression. Among the clinical issues encountered in its use is the mitigation of accompanying pain. The objective becomes one of minimizing the induced surface field while still achieving the target field objective. Three techniques discussed for realizing this end are 1) placing a conducting shield over a portion of the central target region, 2) using supplementary coils of opposite polarity in tandem with the primary field, and 3) opening the core angle to distribute the field. Option (3) shows the greatest promise for reducing the ratio of the maximum surface field to the induced target field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16485747     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2005.862545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  12 in total

1.  Design of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils with optimal trade-off between depth, focality, and energy.

Authors:  Luis J Gomez; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Design and construction of a low cost dsPIC controller based repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulator (rTMS).

Authors:  Mustafa Burunkaya
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 3.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

4.  Coil design considerations for deep transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Prefrontal rTMS for treating depression: location and intensity results from the OPT-TMS multi-site clinical trial.

Authors:  Kevin A Johnson; Mirza Baig; Dave Ramsey; Sarah H Lisanby; David Avery; William M McDonald; Xingbao Li; Elisabeth R Bernhardt; David R Haynor; Paul E Holtzheimer; Harold A Sackeim; Mark S George; Ziad Nahas
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  A numerically optimized active shield for improved transcranial magnetic stimulation targeting.

Authors:  Luis Hernandez-Garcia; Timothy Hall; Luis Gomez; Eric Michielssen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Electric field measurement of two commercial active/sham coils for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  J Evan Smith; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Biophysical foundations underlying TMS: setting the stage for an effective use of neurostimulation in the cognitive neurosciences.

Authors:  Tim Wagner; Jarrett Rushmore; Uri Eden; Antoni Valero-Cabre
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.