Literature DB >> 29855433

Design of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils with optimal trade-off between depth, focality, and energy.

Luis J Gomez1, Stefan M Goetz, Angel V Peterchev.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique used for research and clinical applications. Existent TMS coils are limited in their precision of spatial targeting (focality), especially for deeper targets. This paper presents a methodology for designing TMS coils to achieve optimal trade-off between the depth and focality of the induced electric field (E-field), as well as the energy required by the coil. APPROACH: A multi-objective optimization technique is used for computationally designing TMS coils that achieve optimal trade-offs between E-field focality, depth, and energy (fdTMS coils). The fdTMS coil winding(s) maximize focality (minimize the volume of the brain region with E-field above a given threshold) while reaching a target at a specified depth and not exceeding predefined peak E-field strength and required coil energy. Spherical and MRI-derived head models are used to compute the fundamental depth-focality trade-off as well as focality-energy trade-offs for specific target depths. MAIN
RESULTS: Across stimulation target depths of 1.0-3.4 cm from the brain surface, the suprathreshold volume can be theoretically decreased by 42%-55% compared to existing TMS coil designs. The suprathreshold volume of a figure-8 coil can be decreased by 36%, 44%, or 46%, for matched, doubled, or quadrupled energy. For matched focality and energy, the depth of a figure-8 coil can be increased by 22%. SIGNIFICANCE: Computational design of TMS coils could enable more selective targeting of the induced E-field. The presented results appear to be the first significant advancement in the depth-focality trade-off of TMS coils since the introduction of the figure-8 coil three decades ago, and likely represent the fundamental physical limit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29855433      PMCID: PMC6433395          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aac967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  26 in total

1.  Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Modeling of Different Coil Configurations.

Authors:  Vanessa Guadagnin; Marta Parazzini; Serena Fiocchi; Ilaria Liorni; Paolo Ravazzani
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Improved field localization in transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain with the utilization of a conductive shield plate in the stimulator.

Authors:  Dong-Hun Kim; George E Georghiou; Chulho Won
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Redesigning existing transcranial magnetic stimulation coils to reduce energy: application to low field magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Boshuo Wang; Michael R Shen; Zhi-De Deng; J Evan Smith; Joseph J Tharayil; Clement J Gurrey; Luis J Gomez; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Focusing and targeting of magnetic brain stimulation using multiple coils.

Authors:  J Ruohonen; R J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  How the brain tissue shapes the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander Opitz; Mirko Windhoff; Robin M Heidemann; Robert Turner; Axel Thielscher
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A comparison of language mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and direct cortical stimulation during awake surgery.

Authors:  Thomas Picht; Sandro M Krieg; Nico Sollmann; Judith Rösler; Birat Niraula; Tuomas Neuvonen; Petri Savolainen; Pantelis Lioumis; Jyrki P Mäkelä; Vedran Deletis; Bernhard Meyer; Peter Vajkoczy; Florian Ringel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  A numerically optimized active shield for improved transcranial magnetic stimulation targeting.

Authors:  Luis Hernandez-Garcia; Timothy Hall; Luis Gomez; Eric Michielssen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: a multisite randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  John P O'Reardon; H Brent Solvason; Philip G Janicak; Shirlene Sampson; Keith E Isenberg; Ziad Nahas; William M McDonald; David Avery; Paul B Fitzgerald; Colleen Loo; Mark A Demitrack; Mark S George; Harold A Sackeim
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  The New York Head-A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Lucas C Parra; Stefan Haufe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  9 in total

1.  Conditions for numerically accurate TMS electric field simulation.

Authors:  Luis J Gomez; Moritz Dannhauer; Lari M Koponen; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  The Quasi-uniform assumption for Spinal Cord Stimulation translational research.

Authors:  Niranjan Khadka; Dennis Q Truong; Preston Williams; John H Martin; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Temporally Interfering TMS: Focal and Dynamic Stimulation Location.

Authors:  Majid Memarian Sorkhabi; Karen Wendt; Timothy Denison
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2020-07

Review 4.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Therapeutic and Probe in Schizophrenia: Examining the Role of Neuroimaging and Future Directions.

Authors:  Stephen J Brandt; Halimah Y Oral; Carla Arellano-Bravo; Martin H Plawecki; Tom A Hummer; Michael M Francis
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 5.  Precise Modulation Strategies for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Advances and Future Directions.

Authors:  Gangliang Zhong; Zhengyi Yang; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 5.203

6.  Prediction of Force Recruitment of Neuromuscular Magnetic Stimulation From 3D Field Model of the Thigh.

Authors:  Stefan Goetz; Joerg Kammermann; Florian Helling; Thomas Weyh; Zhongxi Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.528

7.  Interhemispheric plasticity is mediated by maximal potentiation of callosal inputs.

Authors:  Emily Petrus; Galit Saar; Zhiwei Ma; Steve Dodd; John T R Isaac; Alan P Koretsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Neuroimaging and modulation in obesity and diabetes research: 10th anniversary meeting.

Authors:  Maren Laughlin; Bradley Cooke; Kerri Boutelle; Cary R Savage; Alexxai Kravitz; Dana Small; Zoe Arvanitakis; Alex Martin; Luke E Stoeckel
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.551

Review 9.  Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Andrea Antal; Sven Bestmann; Marom Bikson; Carmen Brewer; Jürgen Brockmöller; Linda L Carpenter; Massimo Cincotta; Robert Chen; Jeff D Daskalakis; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Michael D Fox; Mark S George; Donald Gilbert; Vasilios K Kimiskidis; Giacomo Koch; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Jean Pascal Lefaucheur; Letizia Leocani; Sarah H Lisanby; Carlo Miniussi; Frank Padberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Walter Paulus; Angel V Peterchev; Angelo Quartarone; Alexander Rotenberg; John Rothwell; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Mouhsin M Shafi; Hartwig R Siebner; Yoshikatzu Ugawa; Eric M Wassermann; Abraham Zangen; Ulf Ziemann; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.861

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.