Literature DB >> 20965451

A numerically optimized active shield for improved transcranial magnetic stimulation targeting.

Luis Hernandez-Garcia1, Timothy Hall, Luis Gomez, Eric Michielssen.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) devices suffer of poor targeting and penetration depth. A new approach to designing TMS coils is introduced in order to improve the focus of the stimulation region through the use of actively shielded probes. Iterative optimization techniques were used to design different active shielding coils for TMS probes. The new approach aims to increase the amount of energy deposited in a thin cylindrical region below the probe relative to the energy deposited elsewhere in the region ("sharpness"), whereas, simultaneously increase the induced electric field deep in the target region relative to the surface ("penetration"). After convergence, the resulting designs showed that there is a clear tradeoff between sharpness and penetration that can be controlled by the choice of a tuning parameter. The resulting designs were tested on a realistic human head conductivity model, taking the contribution from surface charges into account. The design of choice reduced penetration depths by 16.7%. The activated surface area was reduced by 24.1% and the volume of the activation was reduced from 42.6% by the shield. Restoring the lost penetration could be achieved by increasing the total power to the coil by 16.3%, but in that case, the stimulated volume reduction was only 13.1% and there was a slight increase in the stimulated surface area (2.9%).
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20965451      PMCID: PMC2963031          DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2010.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  19 in total

Review 1.  Paired-pulse investigations of short-latency intracortical facilitation using TMS in humans.

Authors:  J C Rothwell
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience--virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; V Walsh; J Rothwell
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 3.  Applications of TMS to therapy in psychiatry.

Authors:  Sarah H Lisanby; Leann H Kinnunen; Michael J Crupain
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.177

4.  A coil design for transcranial magnetic stimulation of deep brain regions.

Authors:  Yiftach Roth; Abraham Zangen; Mark Hallett
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.177

5.  Electric field properties of two commercial figure-8 coils in TMS: calculation of focality and efficiency.

Authors:  Axel Thielscher; Thomas Kammer
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  The distribution of induced currents in magnetic stimulation of the nervous system.

Authors:  P S Tofts
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Technical and practical aspects of magnetic nerve stimulation.

Authors:  R Jalinous
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.177

8.  Can left prefrontal rTMS be used as a maintenance treatment for bipolar depression?

Authors:  Xingbao Li; Ziad Nahas; Berry Anderson; F Andrew Kozel; Mark S George
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.505

9.  3D modeling of the total electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation using the boundary element method.

Authors:  F S Salinas; J L Lancaster; P T Fox
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: applications for neuropsychopharmacology.

Authors:  Seppo Kähkönen; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.153

View more
  2 in total

1.  Design of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils with optimal trade-off between depth, focality, and energy.

Authors:  Luis J Gomez; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 8.955

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.