Literature DB >> 16477435

Normal range of human left ventricular volumes and mass using steady state free precession MRI in the radial long axis orientation.

Sarah Clay1, Khaled Alfakih, Aleksandra Radjenovic, Timothy Jones, John P Ridgway, Mohan U Sinvananthan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The radial long-axis orientation for the measurement of left ventricular (LV) volume and mass has been shown to have advantages over the short-axis orientation. Previous work has highlighted the need for technique specific normal ranges. The purpose of this study was therefore to establish normal ranges of LV volume and mass for the radial long-axis orientation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty normal subjects (20 males, average age 32.3, age range 19-58; 20 females, average age 37.4, age range 21-54) were examined utilising a steady state free precession (SSFP) pulse sequence. Two observers analysed the images independently using in-house validated software.
RESULTS: The normal ranges for LV end-diastolic volume measurements after adjustment to body surface area (BSA) were 62-120 ml for males and 58-103 ml for females. LV mass indexed to BSA ranged from 50-86 g for males and 36-72 g for females. The normal range for ejection fraction was 49-73% for males and 54-73% for females.
CONCLUSION: A gender specific normal range using SSFP in the radial long-axis orientation was established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16477435     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-005-0025-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  14 in total

1.  MRI-derived left ventricular function parameters and mass in healthy young adults: relation with gender and body size.

Authors:  J T Marcus; L K DeWaal; M J Götte; R J van der Geest; R M Heethaar; A C Van Rossum
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-10

2.  Accuracy of three-dimensional echocardiography with unrestricted selection of imaging planes for measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction.

Authors:  M G Hibberd; M L Chuang; R A Beaudin; M F Riley; M G Mooney; J T Fearnside; W J Manning; P S Douglas
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Left ventricular mass and wall thickness in hypertension. Comparison of M mode and two dimensional echocardiography in two experimental models.

Authors:  E E Salcedo; K Gockowski; R C Tarazi
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1979-10-22       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Quantitation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in post-infarction patients from biplane and single plane two-dimensional echocardiograms. A prospective longitudinal study of 371 patients.

Authors:  M St John Sutton; J E Otterstat; T Plappert; A Parker; D Sekarski; M G Keane; P Poole-Wilson; K Lubsen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  An echocardiographic and magnetic resonance imaging comparative study of right ventricular volume determination.

Authors:  N Aebischer; R Meuli; X Jeanrenaud; J Koerfer; L Kappenberger
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1998-08

6.  Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C H Lorenz; E S Walker; V L Morgan; S S Klein; T P Graham
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  The influence of through-plane motion on left ventricular volumes measured by magnetic resonance imaging: implications for image acquisition and analysis.

Authors:  J T Marcus; M J Götte; L K DeWaal; M R Stam; R J Van der Geest; R M Heethaar; A C Van Rossum
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Echocardiography overestimates left ventricular mass: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  C G Missouris; S M Forbat; D R Singer; N D Markandu; R Underwood; G A MacGregor
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Tomographic three-dimensional echocardiographic determination of chamber size and systolic function in patients with left ventricular aneurysm: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging, cineventriculography, and two-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  T Buck; P Hunold; K U Wentz; W Tkalec; H J Nesser; R Erbel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-12-16       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Global cardiac function using fast breath-hold MRI: validation of new acquisition and analysis techniques.

Authors:  D C Bloomgarden; Z A Fayad; V A Ferrari; B Chin; M G Sutton; L Axel
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  8 in total

1.  Reference values for quantitative left ventricular and left atrial measurements in cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Paul Stolzmann; Hans Scheffel; Sebastian Leschka; Thomas Schertler; Thomas Frauenfelder; Philipp A Kaufmann; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Optimization Framework for Patient-Specific Cardiac Modeling.

Authors:  Joshua Mineroff; Andrew D McCulloch; David Krummen; Baskar Ganapathysubramanian; Adarsh Krishnamurthy
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 2.495

3.  Cardiac morphology and function reference values derived from a large subset of healthy young Caucasian adults by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Florent Le Ven; Karine Bibeau; Élianne De Larochellière; Helena Tizón-Marcos; Stéphanie Deneault-Bissonnette; Philippe Pibarot; Christian F Deschepper; Éric Larose
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Geometry-independent inclusion of basal myocardium yields improved cardiac magnetic resonance agreement with echocardiography and necropsy quantified left-ventricular mass.

Authors:  Lauren A Simprini; Parag Goyal; Noel Codella; David S Fieno; Anika Afroz; Jamie Mullally; Mitchell Cooper; Yi Wang; John Paul Finn; Richard B Devereux; Jonathan W Weinsaft
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 5.  Normal values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults and children.

Authors:  Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Alicia Maceira; Emanuela R Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Jens Vogel-Claussen; Evrim B Turkbey; Rupert Williams; Sven Plein; Michael Tee; John Eng; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  An innovative design for cardiopulmonary resuscitation manikins based on a human-like thorax and embedded flow sensors.

Authors:  Mark Thielen; Rohan Joshi; Frank Delbressine; Sidarto Bambang Oetomo; Loe Feijs
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 1.617

7.  Effects of Heart Rate and Ventricular Wall Thickness on Non-invasive Mapping: An in silico Study.

Authors:  Erick Andres Perez Alday; Dominic G Whittaker; Alan P Benson; Michael A Colman
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 8.  Cardiac MRI assessment of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  Leila Mabudian; Jennifer H Jordan; Wendy Bottinor; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.