Literature DB >> 10966550

Accuracy of three-dimensional echocardiography with unrestricted selection of imaging planes for measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction.

M G Hibberd1, M L Chuang, R A Beaudin, M F Riley, M G Mooney, J T Fearnside, W J Manning, P S Douglas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate, reproducible, noninvasive determination of left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) is important for clinical assessment, risk stratification, selection of therapy, and serial monitoring of patients with cardiovascular disease. Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) approaches have demonstrated significantly greater accuracy than current clinical 2DE, but the clinical utility of 3DE has been limited because of the need for substantial modifications to scanning technique (eg, all image acquisition from a single acoustic window) or cumbersome additional hardware. We describe a novel 3DE system without these limitations and its application to patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were examined by 3DE, 2DE, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The 3DE system used a magnetic scanhead tracking device, and volumes were computed with a novel deformable shell model. End-diastolic volumes and EF by MRI ranged from 96 to 375 mL and 18% to 73%, respectively. There was excellent correlation, without statistically significant differences, between MRI and 3DE for end-systolic volume (ESV) (r(2) = 0.99) and end-diastolic volume (EDV) (r(2) = 0.98), ventricular stroke volume (SV) (r(2) = 0.93), and EF (r(2) = 0.97), with standard error estimates less than 10 mL for volumes and 3% for EF. Conventional 2DE consistently underestimated volumes (EDV, P <.01; ESV, P <.01; SV, P <.05); correlations with MRI were r(2) = 0.91 for ESV, r(2) = 0.88 for EDV, r(2) = 0.62 for SV, and r(2) = 0.72 for EF. Standard error estimates ranged from 16 to 20 mL for ventricular volumes and 9% for EF. Interobserver variability was reduced 3-fold with use of 3DE.
CONCLUSIONS: The novel 3DE system allows unrestricted selection and combination of acoustic windows in a single examination, improves accuracy of estimates of LV volumes and EF 3-fold compared with 2DE, and is practical for routine clinical assessment of LV size and function in patients with a wide range of cardiac pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10966550     DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2000.108513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  9 in total

1.  Measurement of left ventricular volume after anterior myocardial infarction: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, echo and radionuclide ventriculography.

Authors:  S Prasad; D Pennell
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Normal range of human left ventricular volumes and mass using steady state free precession MRI in the radial long axis orientation.

Authors:  Sarah Clay; Khaled Alfakih; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Timothy Jones; John P Ridgway; Mohan U Sinvananthan
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular remodeling index in patients with hypertensive heart disease and coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ming Chen; Jing Wang; Mingxing Xie; Xinfang Wang; Qing Lv; Lei Wang; Yan Li; Manli Fu
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2009-02-18

4.  Measurement of Ejection Fraction by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography to Monitor Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  Tahir Tak; Camilla M Jaekel; Shahyar M Gharacholou; Marshall W Dworak; Scott A Marshall
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2019-10-11

5.  Prognostic value of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography compared to two-dimensional echocardiography in patients with systolic heart failure.

Authors:  Frederico J N Mancuso; Valdir A Moises; Dirceu R Almeida; Dalva Poyares; Luciana J Storti; Flavio S Brito; Sergio Tufik; Angelo A V de Paola; Antonio C C Carvalho; Orlando Campos
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Left ventricular ejection fraction measurements: accuracy and prognostic implications in a large population of patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Alessia Gimelli; Patrizia Landi; Paolo Marraccini; Rosa Sicari; Paolo Frumento; Antonio L'Abbate; Daniele Rovai
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Transthoracic 3D echocardiographic left heart chamber quantification in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Allard T van den Hoven; Jackie S Mc-Ghie; Raluca G Chelu; Anthonie L Duijnhouwer; Vivan J M Baggen; Adriaan Coenen; Wim B Vletter; Marcel L Dijkshoorn; Annemien E van den Bosch; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Quantitative three-dimensional echocardiographic analysis of the bicuspid aortic valve and aortic root: A single modality approach.

Authors:  Melissa M Levack; Gianclaudio Mecozzi; Jayant S Jainandunsing; Wobbe Bouma; Arminder S Jassar; Alison M Pouch; Paul A Yushkevich; Massimo A Mariani; Benjamin M Jackson; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 1.778

9.  Flow-volume loops derived from three-dimensional echocardiography: a novel approach to the assessment of left ventricular hemodynamics.

Authors:  Kambiz Shahgaldi; Emil Söderqvist; Petri Gudmundsson; Reidar Winter; Jacek Nowak; Lars-Ake Brodin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 2.062

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.