Literature DB >> 16472934

Preliminary results of a phase I/II study of simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy for nondisseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Sang-wook Lee1, Geum Mun Back, Byong Yong Yi, Eun Kyung Choi, Seung Do Ahn, Seong Soo Shin, Jung-hun Kim, Sang Yoon Kim, Bong-Jae Lee, Soon Yuhl Nam, Seung-Ho Choi, Seung-Bae Kim, Jin-hong Park, Kang Kyoo Lee, Sung Ho Park, Jong Hoon Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present preliminary results of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy (SMART) boost technique in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients who underwent IMRT for nondisseminated NPC at the Asan Medical Center between September 2001 and December 2003 were prospectively evaluated. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was delivered with the "step and shoot" SMART technique at prescribed doses of 72 Gy (2.4 Gy/day) to the gross tumor volume, 60 Gy (2 Gy/day) to the clinical target volume and metastatic nodal station, and 46 Gy (2 Gy/day) to the clinically negative neck region. Eighteen patients also received cisplatin once per week.
RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 27 months. Nineteen patients completed the treatment without interruption; the remaining patient interrupted treatment for 2 weeks owing to severe pharyngitis and malnutrition. Five patients (25%) had Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 mucositis, whereas 9 (45%) had Grade 3 pharyngitis. Seven patients (35%) lost more than 10% of their pretreatment weight, whereas 11 (55%) required intravenous fluids and/or tube feeding. There was no Grade 3 or 4 xerostomia. All patients showed complete response. Two patients had distant metastases and locoregional recurrence, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy with the SMART boost technique allows parotid sparing, as shown clinically and by dosimetry, and might also be more effective biologically. A larger population of patients and a longer follow-up period are needed to evaluate ultimate tumor control and late toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16472934     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.10.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  20 in total

1.  A benchmark study on 883 nasopharyngeal cancer patients treated in two Italian centres from 1977 to 2000. Part II: Evolving technical choices and toxicity patterns.

Authors:  S M Magrini; S Tonoli; L Costa; N Pasinetti; F Paiar; L Livi; G Simontacchi; I Meattini; L Pegurri; P Borghetti; P Frata; P Ponticelli; M Buglione; G Biti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Treatment results and locoregional recurrence.

Authors:  J L-Y Chen; Y-S Huang; S-H Kuo; Y-F Chen; R-L Hong; J-Y Ko; P-J Lou; C-L Tsai; W-Y Chen; C-W Wang
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  A benchmark study on 883 nasopharyngeal cancer patients treated in two Italian centres from 1977 to 2000. Part I: Evolving technical choices and survival.

Authors:  S Tonoli; S M Magrini; L Costa; F Paiar; G Simontacchi; V Scotti; N Pasinetti; R Barca; D Barbieri; A De Stefani; E Cellai; M Buglione; G Biti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Conventional 2D (2DRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Francesco Moretto; Monica Rampino; Fernando Munoz; Maria Grazia Ruo Redda; Alessia Reali; Vittoria Balcet; Serena Badellino; Cristina Piva; Marina Schena; Mario Airoldi; Oliviero Ostellino; Giancarlo Pecorari; Riccardo Ragona; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: long-term outcome of a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Rensheng Wang; Fang Wu; Heming Lu; Bo Wei; Guosheng Feng; Guisheng Li; Meilian Liu; Haolin Yan; Jinxian Zhu; Yong Zhang; Kai Hu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  The clinical importance of assessing tumor hypoxia: relationship of tumor hypoxia to prognosis and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Joseph C Walsh; Artem Lebedev; Edward Aten; Kathleen Madsen; Liane Marciano; Hartmuth C Kolb
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 8.401

7.  High dose three-dimensional conformal boost using the real-time tumor tracking radiotherapy system in cervical cancer patients unable to receive intracavitary brachytherapy.

Authors:  Hee Chul Park; Shinichi Shimizu; Akio Yonesaka; Kazuhiko Tsuchiya; Yasuhiko Ebina; Hiroshi Taguchi; Norio Katoh; Rumiko Kinoshita; Masayori Ishikawa; Noriaki Sakuragi; Hiroki Shirato
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Pretreatment lifestyle behaviors as survival predictors for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Guo-Ping Shen; Feng-Hua Xu; Fen He; Hong-Lian Ruan; Cui Cui; Li-Zhen Chen; Yi-Xin Zeng; Wei-Hua Jia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Multi-institutional comparison of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning strategies and planning results for nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Sung Ho Park; Hee Chul Park; Suk Won Park; Do Hoon Oh; Youngmin Choi; Jeung Kee Kim; Yong Chan Ahn; Won Park; Hyun Sook Suh; Rena Lee; Hoonsik Bae
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Phase I/II study of induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy and SMART-IMRT-based radiotherapy in locoregionally-advanced nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Ting-Yong Fan; Jun Xing; Jie Lu; Tong-Hai Liu; Min Xu; Ying-Jie Zhang; Qian Shao; Jian-Bin Li; Jin-Ming Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.