Literature DB >> 22095425

A benchmark study on 883 nasopharyngeal cancer patients treated in two Italian centres from 1977 to 2000. Part II: Evolving technical choices and toxicity patterns.

S M Magrini1, S Tonoli, L Costa, N Pasinetti, F Paiar, L Livi, G Simontacchi, I Meattini, L Pegurri, P Borghetti, P Frata, P Ponticelli, M Buglione, G Biti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors sought to define toxicity patterns according to the different accrual periods and clinical-therapeutic features in a large series of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients treated in two Italian centres over more than two decades.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 883 patients consecutively treated with radiotherapy from 1977 to 2000 at the Florence (FLO) and Brescia (IRA) radiation oncology centres were studied. The crude incidence of late treatment toxicity in the different subgroups of patients was calculated and compared.
RESULTS: Higher total and fractional doses and the "older" treatment techniques were related with an increased incidence of the main late effects of treatment. More recently treated patients experienced less treatment-related complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this benchmark study may have implications for understanding and developing new radiotherapy techniques, such as three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and, in particular, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for NPC patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22095425     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0756-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  17 in total

1.  Assessment of different IMRT boost delivery methods on target coverage and normal-tissue sparing.

Authors:  Nesrin Dogan; Stephanie King; Bahman Emami; Najeeb Mohideen; Nena Mirkovic; Leonid B Leybovich; Anil Sethi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Preservation of oral health-related quality of life and salivary flow rates after inverse-planned intensity- modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Matthew B Parliament; Rufus A Scrimger; Stephanie G Anderson; Elizabeth C Kurien; Heather K Thompson; G Colin Field; John Hanson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Parotid-sparing radiotherapy: does it really reduce xerostomia?

Authors:  M K Ng; S V Porceddu; A D Milner; J Corry; C Hornby; G Hope; D Rischin; L J Peters
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.126

4.  Parotid-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: preserved parotid function after IMRT on quantitative salivary scintigraphy, and comparison with historical data after conventional radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ching-Yeh Hsiung; Hui-Min Ting; Hsuan-Ying Huang; Chiang-Hsuan Lee; Eng-Yen Huang; Hsuan-Chih Hsu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Xerostomia and quality of life after intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: initial report on a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Edmond H N Pow; Dora L W Kwong; Anne S McMillan; May C M Wong; Jonathan S T Sham; Lucullus H T Leung; W Keung Leung
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Carcinoma of the nasopharynx treated by radiotherapy alone: determinants of local and regional control.

Authors:  G Sanguineti; F B Geara; A S Garden; S L Tucker; K K Ang; W H Morrison; L J Peters
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Smart (simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy) boost: a new accelerated fractionation schedule for the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  E B Butler; B S Teh; W H Grant; B M Uhl; R B Kuppersmith; J K Chiu; D T Donovan; S Y Woo
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Lack of osteoradionecrosis of the mandible after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: likely contributions of both dental care and improved dose distributions.

Authors:  Merav A Ben-David; Maximiliano Diamante; Jeffrey D Radawski; Karen A Vineberg; Cynthia Stroup; Carol-Anne Murdoch-Kinch; Samuel R Zwetchkenbaum; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Advanced carcinoma of the nasopharynx. A clinical study of 274 patients.

Authors:  Z Petrovich; J D Cox; B Roswit; R MacKintosh; R Middleton; M Ohanian; Y Rao; R W Byhardt; C Paig; J A del Regato
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Preliminary results of a phase I/II study of simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy for nondisseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Sang-wook Lee; Geum Mun Back; Byong Yong Yi; Eun Kyung Choi; Seung Do Ahn; Seong Soo Shin; Jung-hun Kim; Sang Yoon Kim; Bong-Jae Lee; Soon Yuhl Nam; Seung-Ho Choi; Seung-Bae Kim; Jin-hong Park; Kang Kyoo Lee; Sung Ho Park; Jong Hoon Kim
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  1 in total

1.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a low incidence European area : A prospective observational analysis from the Head and Neck Study Group of the Italian Society of Radiation Oncology (AIRO).

Authors:  S Tonoli; D Alterio; O Caspiani; A Bacigalupo; F Bunkheila; M Cianciulli; A Merlotti; A Podhradska; M Rampino; D Cante; L Bruschieri; R Gatta; S M Magrini
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.621

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.