Literature DB >> 21622800

Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome shuffling through recursive population mating leads to improved tolerance to spent sulfite liquor.

Dominic Pinel1, Frédéric D'Aoust, Stephen B del Cardayre, Paramjit K Bajwa, Hung Lee, Vincent J J Martin.   

Abstract

Spent sulfite liquor (SSL) is a waste effluent from sulfite pulping that contains monomeric sugars which can be fermented to ethanol. However, fermentative yeasts used for the fermentation of the sugars in SSL are adversely affected by the inhibitory substances in this complex feedstock. To overcome this limitation, evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was carried out using genome-shuffling technology based on large-scale population cross mating. Populations of UV-light-induced yeast mutants more tolerant than the wild type to hardwood spent sulfite liquor (HWSSL) were first isolated and then recursively mated and enriched for more-tolerant populations. After five rounds of genome shuffling, three strains were isolated that were able to grow on undiluted HWSSL and to support efficient ethanol production from the sugars therein for prolonged fermentation of HWSSL. Analyses showed that greater HWSSL tolerance is associated with improved viability in the presence of salt, sorbitol, peroxide, and acetic acid. Our results showed that evolutionary engineering through genome shuffling will yield robust yeasts capable of fermenting the sugars present in HWSSL, which is a complex substrate containing multiple sources of inhibitors. These strains may not be obtainable through classical evolutionary engineering and can serve as a model for further understanding of the mechanism behind simultaneous tolerance to multiple inhibitors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21622800      PMCID: PMC3147380          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02769-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  31 in total

1.  Genome shuffling leads to rapid phenotypic improvement in bacteria.

Authors:  Ying-Xin Zhang; Kim Perry; Victor A Vinci; Keith Powell; Willem P C Stemmer; Stephen B del Cardayré
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Genomic adaptation of ethanologenic yeast to biomass conversion inhibitors.

Authors:  Z Lewis Liu
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Stress tolerance: the key to effective strains of industrial baker's yeast.

Authors:  P V Attfield
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Batch and continuous culture-based selection strategies for acetic acid tolerance in xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jeremiah Wright; Eleonora Bellissimi; Erik de Hulster; Andreas Wagner; Jack T Pronk; Antonius J A van Maris
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Isolation and characterization of acetic acid-tolerant galactose-fermenting strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from a spent sulfite liquor fermentation plant.

Authors:  T Lindén; J Peetre; B Hahn-Hägerdal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Conversion of furfural in aerobic and anaerobic batch fermentation of glucose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M J Taherzadeh; L Gustafsson; C Niklasson; G Lidén
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Strategies for the genetic manipulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M F Tuite
Journal:  Crit Rev Biotechnol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 8.429

8.  Genome shuffling improves degradation of the anthropogenic pesticide pentachlorophenol by Sphingobium chlorophenolicum ATCC 39723.

Authors:  MingHua Dai; Shelley D Copley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 9.  Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass.

Authors:  H B Klinke; A B Thomsen; B K Ahring
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Keating; Chris Panganiban; Shawn D Mansfield
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  17 in total

1.  Streptomycin resistance-aided genome shuffling to improve doramectin productivity of Streptomyces avermitilis NEAU1069.

Authors:  Ji Zhang; Xiangjing Wang; Jinna Diao; Hairong He; Yuejing Zhang; Wensheng Xiang
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 2.  Strategies for cloning and manipulating natural and synthetic chromosomes.

Authors:  Bogumil J Karas; Yo Suzuki; Philip D Weyman
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Breeding of a xylose-fermenting hybrid strain by mating genetically engineered haploid strains derived from industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Inoue; Seitaro Hashimoto; Akinori Matsushika; Seiya Watanabe; Shigeki Sawayama
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 4.  Improving industrial yeast strains: exploiting natural and artificial diversity.

Authors:  Jan Steensels; Tim Snoek; Esther Meersman; Martina Picca Nicolino; Karin Voordeckers; Kevin J Verstrepen
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 16.408

5.  Deconstructing the genetic basis of spent sulphite liquor tolerance using deep sequencing of genome-shuffled yeast.

Authors:  Dominic Pinel; David Colatriano; Heng Jiang; Hung Lee; Vincent Jj Martin
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  Large-scale robot-assisted genome shuffling yields industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts with increased ethanol tolerance.

Authors:  Tim Snoek; Martina Picca Nicolino; Stefanie Van den Bremt; Stijn Mertens; Veerle Saels; Alex Verplaetse; Jan Steensels; Kevin J Verstrepen
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  Bacterial genome reduction using the progressive clustering of deletions via yeast sexual cycling.

Authors:  Yo Suzuki; Nacyra Assad-Garcia; Maxim Kostylev; Vladimir N Noskov; Kim S Wise; Bogumil J Karas; Jason Stam; Michael G Montague; Timothy J Hanly; Nico J Enriquez; Adi Ramon; Gregory M Goldgof; R Alexander Richter; Sanjay Vashee; Ray-Yuan Chuang; Elizabeth A Winzeler; Clyde A Hutchison; Daniel G Gibson; Hamilton O Smith; John I Glass; J Craig Venter
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Combined substrate, enzyme and yeast feed in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation allow bioethanol production from pretreated spruce biomass at high solids loadings.

Authors:  Rakesh Koppram; Lisbeth Olsson
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Construction of novel Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for bioethanol active dry yeast (ADY) production.

Authors:  Daoqiong Zheng; Ke Zhang; Kehui Gao; Zewei Liu; Xing Zhang; Ou Li; Jianguo Sun; Xiaoyang Zhang; Fengguang Du; Peiyong Sun; Aimin Qu; Xuechang Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The relationship between lysine 4 on histone H3 methylation levels of alcohol tolerance genes and changes of ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Hang Wang; Binfeng Ji; Hongzhen Ren; Chun Meng
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 5.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.