| Literature DB >> 16457709 |
Natalia Semova1, Reginald Storms, Tricia John, Pascale Gaudet, Peter Ulycznyj, Xiang Jia Min, Jian Sun, Greg Butler, Adrian Tsang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aspergillus niger, a saprophyte commonly found on decaying vegetation, is widely used and studied for industrial purposes. Despite its place as one of the most important organisms for commercial applications, the lack of available information about its genetic makeup limits research with this filamentous fungus.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16457709 PMCID: PMC1434744 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-6-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Figure 1Virtual normalization and direct subtraction. A) Relative signal intensity of clones, determined as a ratio of the signal intensity of each individual clone versus the maximum signal intensity present on the array. Signal intensities for the colonies derived from a single 384 well microplate are displayed as a function of relative colony signal strength. B) Proportion of unique ESTs obtained at various stages of the gene discovery process. 1: Sequencing of the first 192 randomly selected clones, 2: Sequencing of the last 192 clones of the 1920 randomly selected clones. 3: Sequencing of the first 192 clones obtained by virtual normalization. 4: Sequencing of the last 192 clones from the 2,304 clones obtained by virtual subtraction. 5: Sequencing of the first 192 clones selected after virtual normalization and direct subtraction, first round. 6: Sequencing of the last 192 clones selected after both virtual normalization and direct subtraction, first round. 7: Sequencing of the first 192 clones selected after virtual normalization and direct subtraction, second round. 8: Sequencing of the last 192 clones from the 10,738 clones selected after virtual normalization and direct subtraction, second round.
A. niger EST summary
| Total templates processed | 15,052 |
| Total EST sequences obtained | 12,820 |
| Average insert size (bp) | 1,470 |
| Average length of high quality sequence per EST sequence obtained (bp) | 551 |
| Average contig size (bp) | 693 |
| Number of clusters | 5,108 |
| Number of clones with full-length inserts | 2,407 |
| Number of coding sequences completely sequenced | 650 |
| Number of clusters derived from more that one unique singleton and/or contig | 74 |
| GC content | 53.5 % |
| Full-length ORFs with a potential signal peptide | 292 |
| Unknown sequences which encode a signal peptide | 107 |
Distribution of homology between the unique set of A. niger singleton and contig sequences and various databases as determined by BLASTX
| Total GenBank Database set | 4321 (83.06%) | 3367 (64.73 %) | 811 (15.59%) | 143 (2.75%) | 881 (16.93%) |
| Set of predicted proteins for | 4195 (80.64%) | 3313 (63.69%) | 682 (13.11%) | 200 (3.84%) | 1007 (19.36%) |
| Set of predicted proteins for | 3615 (69.49%) | 2261 (43.46%) | 995 (19.13%) | 359 (6.90%) | 1587 (30.51%) |
| Set of predicted proteins for | 2581 (49.62%) | 1292 (24.84%) | 864 (16.60%) | 425 (8.17%) | 2621 (50.38%) |
| Set of predicted proteins for | 2386 (45.87%) | 1110 (21.34%) | 803 (15.44%) | 359 (6.90%) | 2816 (54.13%) |
Figure 2GO mappings for the . Relative representation of GO mappings for the proteins coded for by the unique set of A. niger singletons and contigs. A) Biological process; B) Cellular component; C) Molecular function. Note, because individual proteins can map to multiple GO categories, the sum of the GO mappings can exceed 100%.
Comparison of GO profiling among different fungal species
| metabolism | 71.4% | 72.7% | 76.0% | 74.6% | 75.6% | 71.4% | 75.3% | |
| cellular physiological process | 50.3% | 46.7% | 34.2% | 32.6% | 30.2% | 34.8% | 36.9% | |
| cell growth and/or maintenance | 48.5% | 45.2% | 31.9% | 31.6% | 29.4% | 33.8% | 36.2% | |
| cell communication | 4.8% | 11.05% | 12.8% | 4.7% | 3.8% | 3.9% | 4.3% | |
| cell | 99.3% | 99.74% | 96.8% | 95.5% | 98.1% | 97.8% | 96.5% | |
| unlocalized | 1.0% | 0.26% | 1.9% | 2.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | 0.8% | |
| extracellular | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.2% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 2.3% | |
| catalytic activity | 52.1% | 76.46% | 54.9% | 65.4% | 62.6% | 60.4% | 59.9% | |
| binding | 46.6% | 19.47% | 45.7% | 43.0% | 41.8% | 41.5% | 49.5% | |
| transporter activity | 14.8% | 1.50% | 11.0% | 10.6% | 15.5% | 12.2% | 10.1% | |
| transcription regulator activity | 6.6% | 4.28% | 4.9% | 3.3% | 4.6% | 6.6% | 4.1% | |
| structural molecule activity | 5.3% | 0.0% | 2.9% | 1.9% | 2.1% | 1.7% | 2.2% | |
| enzyme regulator activity | 2.9% | 0.86% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.9% | |
| chaperone activity | 2.2% | 2.50% | 1.5% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.8% | 1.0% | |
| signal transducer activity | 1.9% | 0.0% | 1.8% | 1.9% | 1.5% | 1.1% | 1.2% | |
| translation regulator activity | 1.4% | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.1% | 1.8% | 0.8% | 0.8% | |