Literature DB >> 18816799

Improving NMR protein structure quality by Rosetta refinement: a molecular replacement study.

Theresa A Ramelot1, Srivatsan Raman, Alexandre P Kuzin, Rong Xiao, Li-Chung Ma, Thomas B Acton, John F Hunt, Gaetano T Montelione, David Baker, Michael A Kennedy.   

Abstract

The structure of human protein HSPC034 has been determined by both solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. Refinement of the NMR structure ensemble, using a Rosetta protocol in the absence of NMR restraints, resulted in significant improvements not only in structure quality, but also in molecular replacement (MR) performance with the raw X-ray diffraction data using MOLREP and Phaser. This method has recently been shown to be generally applicable with improved MR performance demonstrated for eight NMR structures refined using Rosetta (Qian et al., Nature 2007;450:259-264). Additionally, NMR structures of HSPC034 calculated by standard methods that include NMR restraints have improvements in the RMSD to the crystal structure and MR performance in the order DYANA, CYANA, XPLOR-NIH, and CNS with explicit water refinement (CNSw). Further Rosetta refinement of the CNSw structures, perhaps due to more thorough conformational sampling and/or a superior force field, was capable of finding alternative low energy protein conformations that were equally consistent with the NMR data according to the Recall, Precision, and F-measure (RPF) scores. On further examination, the additional MR-performance shortfall for NMR refined structures as compared with the X-ray structure were attributed, in part, to crystal-packing effects, real structural differences, and inferior hydrogen bonding in the NMR structures. A good correlation between a decrease in the number of buried unsatisfied hydrogen-bond donors and improved MR performance demonstrates the importance of hydrogen-bond terms in the force field for improving NMR structures. The superior hydrogen-bond network in Rosetta-refined structures demonstrates that correct identification of hydrogen bonds should be a critical goal of NMR structure refinement. Inclusion of nonbivalent hydrogen bonds identified from Rosetta structures as additional restraints in the structure calculation results in NMR structures with improved MR performance. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18816799      PMCID: PMC2878636          DOI: 10.1002/prot.22229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  87 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  A systematic case study on using NMR models for molecular replacement: p53 tetramerization domain revisited.

Authors:  Y W Chen; G M Clore
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2000-12

Review 3.  Does NMR mean "not for molecular replacement"? Using NMR-based search models to solve protein crystal structures.

Authors:  Y W Chen; E J Dodson; G J Kleywegt
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Influence of non-bonded parameters on the quality of NMR structures: a new force field for NMR structure calculation.

Authors:  J P Linge; M Nilges
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 5.  Solution solution: using NMR models for molecular replacement.

Authors:  Y W Chen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2001-09-21

6.  Pushing the boundaries of molecular replacement with maximum likelihood.

Authors:  R J Read
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2001-09-21

7.  Sources of and solutions to problems in the refinement of protein NMR structures against torsion angle potentials of mean force.

Authors:  J Kuszewski; G M Clore
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology.

Authors:  G Cornilescu; F Delaglio; A Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Crystal structure of the APC10/DOC1 subunit of the human anaphase-promoting complex.

Authors:  K S Wendt; H C Vodermaier; U Jacob; C Gieffers; M Gmachl; J M Peters; R Huber; P Sondermann
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2001-09

10.  Automated MAD and MIR structure solution.

Authors:  T C Terwilliger; J Berendzen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  1999-04
View more
  39 in total

1.  Resolution-by-proxy: a simple measure for assessing and comparing the overall quality of NMR protein structures.

Authors:  Mark Berjanskii; Jianjun Zhou; Yongjie Liang; Guohui Lin; David S Wishart
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Determination of solution structures of proteins up to 40 kDa using CS-Rosetta with sparse NMR data from deuterated samples.

Authors:  Oliver F Lange; Paolo Rossi; Nikolaos G Sgourakis; Yifan Song; Hsiau-Wei Lee; James M Aramini; Asli Ertekin; Rong Xiao; Thomas B Acton; Gaetano T Montelione; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Alternate states of proteins revealed by detailed energy landscape mapping.

Authors:  Michael D Tyka; Daniel A Keedy; Ingemar André; Frank Dimaio; Yifan Song; David C Richardson; Jane S Richardson; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Automated protein structure calculation from NMR data.

Authors:  Mike P Williamson; C Jeremy Craven
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  The quality and validation of structures from structural genomics.

Authors:  Marcin J Domagalski; Heping Zheng; Matthew D Zimmerman; Zbigniew Dauter; Alexander Wlodawer; Wladek Minor
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

6.  Quantum-mechanics-derived 13Calpha chemical shift server (CheShift) for protein structure validation.

Authors:  Jorge A Vila; Yelena A Arnautova; Osvaldo A Martin; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Structural analysis of a putative family 32 carbohydrate-binding module from the Streptococcus pneumoniae enzyme EndoD.

Authors:  D Wade Abbott; Alisdair Boraston
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2011-03-24

8.  Crystal structure of the intraflagellar transport complex 25/27.

Authors:  Sagar Bhogaraju; Michael Taschner; Michaela Morawetz; Claire Basquin; Esben Lorentzen
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Aromatic claw: A new fold with high aromatic content that evades structural prediction.

Authors:  Joseph R Sachleben; Aashish N Adhikari; Grzegorz Gawlak; Robert J Hoey; Gaohua Liu; Andrzej Joachimiak; Gaetano T Montelione; Tobin R Sosnick; Shohei Koide
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Unique opportunities for NMR methods in structural genomics.

Authors:  Gaetano T Montelione; Cheryl Arrowsmith; Mark E Girvin; Michael A Kennedy; John L Markley; Robert Powers; James H Prestegard; Thomas Szyperski
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2009-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.