Literature DB >> 16456631

Effectiveness of fish habitat compensation in Canada in achieving no net loss.

Jason T Quigley1, David J Harper.   

Abstract

Fish habitat loss has been prevalent over the last century in Canada. To prevent further erosion of the resource base and ensure sustainable development, Fisheries and Oceans Canada enacted the habitat provisions of the Fisheries Act in 1976. In 1986, this was articulated by a policy that a "harmful alteration, disruption, or destruction to fish habitat" (HADD) cannot occur unless authorised with legally binding compensatory habitat to offset the HADD. Despite Canada's progressive conservation policies, the effectiveness of compensation habitat in replicating ecosystem function has never been tested on a national scale. The effectiveness of habitat compensation projects in achieving no net loss of habitat productivity (NNL) was evaluated at 16 sites across Canada. Periphyton biomass, invertebrate density, fish biomass, and riparian vegetation density were used as indicators of habitat productivity. Approximately 63% of projects resulted in net losses in habitat productivity. These projects were characterised by mean compensation ratios (area gain:area loss) of 0.7:1. Twenty-five percent of projects achieved NNL and 12% of projects achieved a net gain in habitat productivity. These projects were characterised by mean ratios of 1.1:1 and 4.8:1, respectively. We demonstrated that artificially increasing ratios to 2:1 was not sufficient to achieve NNL for all projects. The ability to replicate ecosystem function is clearly limited. Improvements in both compensation science and institutional approaches are recommended to achieve Canada's conservation goal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16456631     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-004-0263-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  6 in total

1.  Validity of Performance Criteria and a Tentative Model for Regulatory Use in Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Permitting.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  The US Clean Water Act and habitat replacement: evaluation of mitigation sites in Orange County, California, USA.

Authors:  Mark F Sudol; Richard F Ambrose
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Section 404 wetland mitigation and permit success criteria in Pennsylvania, USA, 1986-1999.

Authors:  Charles Andrew Cole; Deborah Shafer
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  No net loss of fish habitat: a review and analysis of habitat compensation in Canada.

Authors:  D J Harper; J T Quigley
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Compliance with Canada's Fisheries Act: a field audit of habitat compensation projects.

Authors:  Jason T Quigley; David J Harper
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Research: The Effect of Wetland Mitigation Banking on the Achievement of No-Net-Loss.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.266

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  A rapid method to score stream reaches based on the overall performance of their main ecological functions.

Authors:  David K Rowe; Stephanie Parkyn; John Quinn; Kevin Collier; Chris Hatton; Michael K Joy; John Maxted; Stephen Moore
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Net present biodiversity value and the design of biodiversity offsets.

Authors:  Jacob McC Overton; R T Theo Stephens; Simon Ferrier
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Estimating fish exploitation and aquatic habitat loss across diffuse inland recreational fisheries.

Authors:  Derrick Tupper de Kerckhove; Charles Kenneth Minns; Cindy Chu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A method for calculating minimum biodiversity offset multipliers accounting for time discounting, additionality and permanence.

Authors:  Jussi Laitila; Atte Moilanen; Federico M Pouzols
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 7.781

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.