Literature DB >> 12481917

Section 404 wetland mitigation and permit success criteria in Pennsylvania, USA, 1986-1999.

Charles Andrew Cole1, Deborah Shafer.   

Abstract

Twenty-three Section 404 permits in central Pennsylvania (covering a wetland age range of 1-14 years) were examined to determine the type of mitigation wetland permitted, how the sites were built, and what success criteria were used for evaluation. Most permits allowed for mitigation out-of-kind, either vegetatively or through hydrogeomorphic class. The mitigation process has resulted in a shift from impacted wetlands dominated by woody species to less vegetated mitigation wetlands, a trend that appears to be occurring nationwide. An estimate of the percent cover of emergent vegetation was the only success criterion specified in the majority of permits. About 60% of the mitigation wetlands were judged as meeting their originally defined success criteria, some after more than 10 years. The permit process appears to have resulted in a net gain of almost 0.05 ha of wetlands per mitigation project. However, due to the replacement of emergent, scrub-shrub, and forested wetlands with open water ponds or uplands, mitigation practices probably led to a net loss of vegetated wetlands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12481917     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-002-2717-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  11 in total

1.  Compliance with wetland mitigation standards in the upper peninsula of Michigan, USA.

Authors:  Andrew T Kozich; Kathleen E Halvorsen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  No net loss of fish habitat: a review and analysis of habitat compensation in Canada.

Authors:  D J Harper; J T Quigley
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  It's all in the numbers: acreage tallies and environmental program evaluation.

Authors:  Lisa Dale; Andrea K Gerlak
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Effectiveness of fish habitat compensation in Canada in achieving no net loss.

Authors:  Jason T Quigley; David J Harper
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Compliance with Canada's Fisheries Act: a field audit of habitat compensation projects.

Authors:  Jason T Quigley; David J Harper
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Losing function through wetland mitigation in central Pennsylvania, USA.

Authors:  S M Hoeltje; C A Cole
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Performance criteria, compliance success, and vegetation development in compensatory mitigation wetlands.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Matthews; Anton G Endress
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-08-05       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Determinants of spatial and temporal patterns in compensatory wetland mitigation.

Authors:  Todd BenDor; Nicholas Brozović
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  An Assessment of Long-Term Compliance with Performance Standards in Compensatory Mitigation Wetlands.

Authors:  Kyle Van den Bosch; Jeffrey W Matthews
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  Compensatory stream and wetland mitigation in North Carolina: an evaluation of regulatory success.

Authors:  Tammy Hill; Eric Kulz; Breda Munoz; John R Dorney
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.