Literature DB >> 16082569

No net loss of fish habitat: a review and analysis of habitat compensation in Canada.

D J Harper1, J T Quigley.   

Abstract

The achievement of No Net Loss (NNL) through habitat compensation has rarely been assessed in Canada. Files relating to 124 Fisheries Act Section 35(2) authorizations issued by Fisheries and Oceans Canada for the harmful alteration, disruption, and destruction of fish habitat (HADD) were collected and reviewed. Data extracted from these files were pooled and analyzed to provide an indication of the types of HADDs that have been authorized in Canada, what habitats have been affected, and what habitat management approaches have been used when compensating for HADDs and monitoring and ensuring the success of the compensation. Determinations regarding the effectiveness of habitat compensation in achieving NNL were made. Impacts to 419,562 m2 of fish habitat from the 124 authorized HADDs were offset by 1,020,388 m2 of compensatory habitat. Eighty percent of the authorizations had compensation ratios (compensation area:HADD area) of 2:1 or less, and 25% of the authorizations had a compensation ratio that was less than 1:1. In-channel and riparian habitat were the most frequently impacted habitats. Urban development and roads and highways resulted in the greatest areal loss of habitat. The compensation option that was most often selected was the creation of in-kind habitat. The mean duration of post-construction monitoring programs was 3.7 years. Determinations of NNL could only be made for 17 authorizations as a result of poor proponent compliance with monitoring requirements and the qualitative assessment procedures used by the monitoring programs. Adequate resources, proper training, and standardized approaches to data management and monitoring programs are required to ensure that the conservation goal of NNL can be achieved in Canada.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16082569     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-004-0114-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  3 in total

1.  Validity of Performance Criteria and a Tentative Model for Regulatory Use in Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Permitting.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  The US Clean Water Act and habitat replacement: evaluation of mitigation sites in Orange County, California, USA.

Authors:  Mark F Sudol; Richard F Ambrose
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Section 404 wetland mitigation and permit success criteria in Pennsylvania, USA, 1986-1999.

Authors:  Charles Andrew Cole; Deborah Shafer
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.266

  3 in total
  9 in total

1.  Effectiveness of fish habitat compensation in Canada in achieving no net loss.

Authors:  Jason T Quigley; David J Harper
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Compliance with Canada's Fisheries Act: a field audit of habitat compensation projects.

Authors:  Jason T Quigley; David J Harper
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  A rapid method to score stream reaches based on the overall performance of their main ecological functions.

Authors:  David K Rowe; Stephanie Parkyn; John Quinn; Kevin Collier; Chris Hatton; Michael K Joy; John Maxted; Stephen Moore
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Biodiversity offsets: two New Zealand case studies and an assessment framework.

Authors:  David A Norton
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Assessing the effectiveness of a constructed Arctic stream using multiple biological attributes.

Authors:  Nicholas E Jones; Garry J Scrimgeour; William M Tonn
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Accounting for Uncertainty and Time Lags in Equivalency Calculations for Offsetting in Aquatic Resources Management Programs.

Authors:  Michael J Bradford
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Lessons Learned from an Industry, Government and University Collaboration to Restore Stream Habitats and Mitigate Effects.

Authors:  Nicholas E Jones; Garry J Scrimgeour; William M Tonn
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Estimating fish exploitation and aquatic habitat loss across diffuse inland recreational fisheries.

Authors:  Derrick Tupper de Kerckhove; Charles Kenneth Minns; Cindy Chu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A method for calculating minimum biodiversity offset multipliers accounting for time discounting, additionality and permanence.

Authors:  Jussi Laitila; Atte Moilanen; Federico M Pouzols
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 7.781

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.