Literature DB >> 9950696

Research: The Effect of Wetland Mitigation Banking on the Achievement of No-Net-Loss.

.   

Abstract

/ This study determines whether the 68 wetland mitigation banks in existence in the United States through 1 January 1996 are achieving no-net-loss of wetland acreage nationally and regionally. Although 74% of the individual banks achieve no-net-loss by acreage, overall, wetland mitigation banks are projected to result in a net loss of 21,328 acres of wetlands nationally, 52% of the acreage in banks, as already credited wetland acreages are converted to otheruses. While most wetland mitigation banks are using appropriate compensation methods and ratios, several of the largest banks use preservation or enhancement, instead of restoration or creation. Most of these preservation/enhancement banks use minimum mitigation ratios of 1:1, which is much lower than ratios given in current guidelines. Assuming that mitigation occurs in these banks as preservation at the minimum allowable ratio, ten of these banks, concentrated in the western Gulf Coast region, will account for over 99% of projected net wetland acreage loss associated with banks. We conclude that wetland mitigation banking is a conceptually sound environmental policy and planning tool, but only if applied according to recently issued guidelines that ensure no-net-loss of wetland functions and values. Wetland mitigation banking inevitably leads to geographic relocation of wetlands, and therefore changes, either positively or negatively, the functions they perform and ecosystem services they provide. KEY WORDS: Mitigation banking; Wetlands; Army Corps of Engineers; No-net-loss

Year:  1999        PMID: 9950696     DOI: 10.1007/s002679900190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  7 in total

1.  Compliance with wetland mitigation standards in the upper peninsula of Michigan, USA.

Authors:  Andrew T Kozich; Kathleen E Halvorsen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Microbial community structure and denitrification in a wetland mitigation bank.

Authors:  Ariane L Peralta; Jeffrey W Matthews; Angela D Kent
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  It's all in the numbers: acreage tallies and environmental program evaluation.

Authors:  Lisa Dale; Andrea K Gerlak
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Effectiveness of fish habitat compensation in Canada in achieving no net loss.

Authors:  Jason T Quigley; David J Harper
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Compliance with Canada's Fisheries Act: a field audit of habitat compensation projects.

Authors:  Jason T Quigley; David J Harper
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Performance criteria, compliance success, and vegetation development in compensatory mitigation wetlands.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Matthews; Anton G Endress
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-08-05       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  'Sub-Prime' Water, Low-Security Entitlements and Policy Challenges in Over-Allocated River Basins: the Case of the Murray-Darling Basin.

Authors:  Harriet Elizabeth Moore; Ian D Rutherfurd; Murray C Peel; Avril Horne
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.266

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.