Literature DB >> 16454940

Relationship between embryo quality and aneuploidies.

V Baltaci1, H Satiroglu, C Kabukçu, E Unsal, B Aydinuraz, O Uner, Y Aktas, E Cetinkaya, F Turhan, A Aktan.   

Abstract

Many high-grade embryos selected for transfer according to their morphological evaluation were detected to have chromosomal abnormalities after aneuploidy screening for infertility by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). The aim of this study was to detect if there is any correlation between embryo quality and genetic status. The chromosomal status of the day three embryos was studied by multicolour fluorescence in-situ hybridization for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y. PGD was performed on 132 patients for 1107 embryos. The correlation between embryo quality and aneuploidy was analysed. The analysis showed that a large proportion of normal embryos (50.7%, n = 280) were grade I. In addition, a considerably high proportion of aneuploid embryos (36.1%, n = 83) were evaluated as grade I. There was a significant relationship between PGD results and embryo grades (P = 0.001). Of the 69 polyploid embryos, 21.7% were grade I and 37.8% were grade II. Of the 83 haploid embryos, 27.8% were grade I and 34.9% were grade II. Euploidy was positively related to morphological grade of embryo (P = 0.001). It was also possible for chromosomally abnormal embryos to have a good developmental potential, and they could be selected for embryo transfer unless the PGD procedure was applied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16454940     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60984-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  12 in total

Review 1.  PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Connie C Wong; Kevin E Loewke; Nancy L Bossert; Barry Behr; Christopher J De Jonge; Thomas M Baer; Renee A Reijo Pera
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-10-03       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Contraction behaviour reduces embryo competence in high-quality euploid blastocysts.

Authors:  Xavier Viñals Gonzalez; Rabi Odia; Suzanne Cawood; Matthew Gaunt; Wael Saab; Svidrya Seshadri; Paul Serhal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Chromosomal instability in mammalian pre-implantation embryos: potential causes, detection methods, and clinical consequences.

Authors:  Brittany L Daughtry; Shawn L Chavez
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.249

5.  Evaluation of in vitro fertilization parameters and estrogen receptor alpha gene polymorphisms for women with unexplained infertility.

Authors:  Ozge Uner Ayvaz; Abdullah Ekmekçi; Volkan Baltaci; Hacer Ilke Onen; Evrim Unsal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Could time-lapse embryo imaging reduce the need for biopsy and PGS?

Authors:  Jason E Swain
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Predictive value of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in repeated IVF-ET cycles among women with recurrent implantation failure.

Authors:  K Pagidas; Y Ying; D Keefe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Human pre-implantation embryo development.

Authors:  Kathy K Niakan; Jinnuo Han; Roger A Pedersen; Carlos Simon; Renee A Reijo Pera
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol.

Authors:  D S Johnson; G Gemelos; J Baner; A Ryan; C Cinnioglu; M Banjevic; R Ross; M Alper; B Barrett; J Frederick; D Potter; B Behr; M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Blastocyst score, a blastocyst quality ranking tool, is a predictor of blastocyst ploidy and implantation potential.

Authors:  Qiansheng Zhan; E T Sierra; Jonas Malmsten; Zhen Ye; Zev Rosenwaks; Nikica Zaninovic
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.